BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8656788)

  • 1. [The breast cancer unit has a problem].
    Ahlström S
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Mar; 93(10):880. PubMed ID: 8656788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Challenges of breast radiologists in Lebanon].
    Moussa T; Assi T
    Bull Cancer; 2019 Jun; 106(6):604-606. PubMed ID: 31104757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic aspects of MR-mammography in dense breasts.
    Kaiser CG; Reich C; Wasser K; Schönberg SO; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S69-71. PubMed ID: 23083609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Helping patients overcome their fear of mammography.
    Peart O
    Radiol Technol; 1994; 66(1):34-8; quiz 39-40. PubMed ID: 7997524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Higher costs but limited benefits with two-picture mammography in screening].
    Lundgren B; Medin B
    Lakartidningen; 1981 Jun; 78(25):2455-7. PubMed ID: 6790886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Importance of advise prior to mammography in campaigns for the screening of cancer of the breast].
    Seguí Díaz M
    Aten Primaria; 1999 Jun; 24(1):48. PubMed ID: 10427906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selecting a screening mammography facility.
    Kaplan AS; Wollerton MA; Rachlin JA
    Am Fam Physician; 1988 Oct; 38(4):143-7. PubMed ID: 3051971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Mammography screening. A pilot study of the psychological effects].
    Olsson P; Armelius K; Lenner P; Westman G
    Lakartidningen; 1993 Sep; 90(38):3213-4, 3217. PubMed ID: 8231475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening mammography: the other side of the coin.
    Lazaro EJ; Spillert CR; Munoz E; Salzer-Pagan J
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1993 Mar; 85(3):165. PubMed ID: 8474127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cost-effectiveness of MR-imaging in the preoperative work-up of suspicious breast lesions].
    Schmitt KP; Boehm T; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 2001 Oct; 173(10):898-901. PubMed ID: 11588676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Offering mammography is beneficial in the long run].
    Cederblom S
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Dec; 92(51-52):4865-8. PubMed ID: 8544497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost reduction in mammography.
    Dodd GD
    Cancer; 1989 Dec; 64(12 Suppl):2667-70. PubMed ID: 2819679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating treatment cost functions for progressive diseases: a multiproduct approach with an application to breast cancer.
    Butler JR; Furnival CM; Hart RF
    J Health Econ; 1995 Aug; 14(3):361-85. PubMed ID: 10145140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Breast cancer screening in Gävleborgs County--method, organization, economy].
    Lundgren B
    Lakartidningen; 1985 Feb; 82(9):714-6. PubMed ID: 3982172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does the marginal benefit exceed the marginal cost?
    Keen JD; Keen JE
    Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):299-300; author reply 300. PubMed ID: 17392264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anxiety and specific distress in women at intermediate and high risk of breast cancer before and after surveillance by magnetic resonance imaging and mammography versus standard mammography.
    Brédart A; Kop JL; Fall M; Pelissier S; Simondi C; Dolbeault S; Livartowski A; Tardivon A;
    Psychooncology; 2012 Nov; 21(11):1185-94. PubMed ID: 21812069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of mammography, MRI, and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening.
    Feig S
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):879-91. PubMed ID: 20868891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammograms: Reducing Patient Anxiety.
    Randel S
    Radiol Technol; 2016 Jul; 87(6):707-9. PubMed ID: 27390241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.
    Burnside E; Belkora J; Esserman L
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast cancer and the role of a specialist nurse.
    Phipps RF; Richardson A; Perez D; Gousmett E; Doyle T
    N Z Med J; 1993 Feb; 106(949):36-7. PubMed ID: 8464589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.