69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8656864)
1. [Some glipses from the history of mammography: from radiography of preparations to general screening].
Andersson I
Lakartidningen; 1996 Apr; 93(14):1329-33. PubMed ID: 8656864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [History of mammography].
Picard JD
Bull Acad Natl Med; 1998; 182(8):1613-20. PubMed ID: 10188307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992: history and process.
Houn F; Franke KA; Elliott ML; Finder CA; Burkhart RL; Fischer R
Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(4):485-92. PubMed ID: 10343015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The evolution of mammography.
Gold RH
Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 1732920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short history of mammography: a Belgian perspective.
Van Steen A; Van Tiggelen R
JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 17696077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Debate among researchers over mammography screening and the potential effect of that debate on screening in the United States.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Jan; 100(2):156. PubMed ID: 18182608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Highlights from the history of mammography.
Gold RH; Bassett LW; Widoff BE
Radiographics; 1990 Nov; 10(6):1111-31. PubMed ID: 2259767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [We should insist on mammographic mass screening. Its value for age groups 50-69 is indisputable].
Larsson LG; Nyström L
Lakartidningen; 1996 Apr; 93(14):1338-42. PubMed ID: 8656867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Mammography in the USA].
Linton OW
J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 75(10):493-6. PubMed ID: 7799270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. History and recent developments in xeroradiography of the breast.
Wolfe JN
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):929-37. PubMed ID: 3306774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "To see today with the eyes of tomorrow": A history of screening mammography.
Lerner BH
Can Bull Med Hist; 2003; 20(2):299-321. PubMed ID: 14723235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammography: better, safer, and more effective?
Linton OW; Schauer DA
Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 16793970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The history of the "patient": hazard, means, or object of the history of medicine?].
Rieder P
Gesnerus; 2003; 60(3-4):260-71. PubMed ID: 15030056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Tracheostomy from A to Z: historical context and current challenges.
Pierson DJ
Respir Care; 2005 Apr; 50(4):473-5. PubMed ID: 15807920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammograms do save lives, says a new study.
Levenson D
Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res; 2002 Aug; 13(16):5-7. PubMed ID: 12564430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Screening and treatment of scoliosis in teenagers--a historical parenthesis?].
Bergström E
Lakartidningen; 1993 Nov; 90(44):3837. PubMed ID: 7748241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Orthodontics in 3 millennia. Chapter 7: Facial analysis before the advent of the cephalometer.
Wahl N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 16473724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of periodic breast cancer screening with mammography: methodology and early observations. 1966.
Shapiro S; Strax P; Venet L
CA Cancer J Clin; 1990; 40(2):111-25. PubMed ID: 2106369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Promising results from mammography screening].
Thurfjell E
Lakartidningen; 1995 Mar; 92(12):1197-8. PubMed ID: 7707753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [The National Board of Health and Welfare: stronger evidence basis for the benefits of mammography].
Rosén M; Nyström L; Stenbeck M
Lakartidningen; 2000 Feb; 97(7):739-40. PubMed ID: 10740383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
