These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8657263)

  • 41. Doctors propose panel on research misconduct.
    Klarreich E
    Nature; 2001 Oct; 413(6855):442. PubMed ID: 11586312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A question of style: method, integrity and the meaning of proper science.
    Penders B; Vos R; Horstman K
    Endeavour; 2009 Sep; 33(3):93-8. PubMed ID: 19665231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Scientific misconduct.
    Parmley WW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Dec; 22(7):2055. PubMed ID: 8245364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Procedure for investigation of research misconduct--active treatment or sham intervention?
    Wilmshurst P
    J R Soc Med; 2008 Nov; 101(11):524-5. PubMed ID: 19029346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Meeting calls for a national body to respond to research misconduct.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 2001 Oct; 323(7318):889. PubMed ID: 11668130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Scientific licence.
    Siddhartha V
    Nature; 1991 May; 351(6324):263. PubMed ID: 2034266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Worse than pulp fiction: fraud in science.
    Ganten D
    J Mol Med (Berl); 1997 Oct; 75(10):689-91. PubMed ID: 9382991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Devi case and more.
    Bailar JC
    Science; 1995 Aug; 269(5227):1035. PubMed ID: 7652546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Scientific conduct: contrasts on a gray scale.
    Bloom FE
    Science; 1995 Jun; 268(5218):1679. PubMed ID: 7792581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Science is great, but scientists are still people.
    Kornberg A
    Science; 1992 Aug; 257(5072):859. PubMed ID: 1502544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Respecting cancer committee members as volunteers: tools for the cancer registrar.
    Warren PS
    J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(3):131-2. PubMed ID: 24643216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. UK Panel for Research Integrity: more than a smokescreen.
    Kennedy I
    Lancet; 2008 Nov; 372(9653):1877. PubMed ID: 19041791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Ensuring integrity in science.
    Cicerone RJ
    Science; 2010 Feb; 327(5966):624. PubMed ID: 20133539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. McGill: analyzing the data.
    Taubes G
    Science; 1995 Jun; 268(5218):1714. PubMed ID: 7605516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Scientific integrity.
    Loveridge P
    CMAJ; 1993 Oct; 149(7):923; author reply 923-4. PubMed ID: 8402411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Truth, fairness, and the definition of scientific misconduct.
    Grinnell F
    J Lab Clin Med; 1997 Feb; 129(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 9016854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Credibility in science and the press.
    Koshland DE
    Science; 1991 Nov; 254(5032):629. PubMed ID: 1948037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Overdue: a US advisory board for research integrity.
    Gunsalus CK; McNutt MK; Martinson BC; Faulkner LR; Nerem RM
    Nature; 2019 Feb; 566(7743):173-175. PubMed ID: 30742085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Scientific dishonesty--the need for precise concepts and effective tools.
    Riis P
    J Intern Med; 1993 Mar; 233(3):213-4. PubMed ID: 8450288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Science policy in the USA. Sweeping changes to government science under the Bush administration may have caused long-term damage, scientists fear.
    Hadley C
    EMBO Rep; 2004 Oct; 5(10):932-5. PubMed ID: 15459743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.