256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8657264)
1. Clearing of researcher in 'Baltimore affair' boosts demand for reforms.
Steele F
Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):719-20. PubMed ID: 8657264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How congressional pressure shaped the 'Baltimore case'.
Friedly J
Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5277):873-5. PubMed ID: 8711476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.
Pascal CB
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Spring helps research integrity report resurface.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(10):746. PubMed ID: 8598578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The assault on David Baltimore.
Kevles DJ
New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Imanishi-Kari ruling slams ORI.
Kaiser J; Marshall E
Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5270):1864-5. PubMed ID: 8658151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Baltimore defeat a defeat for research.
Nature; 1991 Dec; 354(6353):419-20. PubMed ID: 1660961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Legal protections for the scientific misconduct whistleblower.
Poon P
J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 7627310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A judgement fit for prime time.
Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):717. PubMed ID: 8657262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Misconduct charges dropped against AIDS virus scientist.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():1, 11. PubMed ID: 11647009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific misconduct in US health service.
Choo V
Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1359. PubMed ID: 11644692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A costly settlement ends whistle-blower suit.
Taubes G
Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):605. PubMed ID: 8303265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Of whistleblowers, investigators, and judges.
Scarr S; Ernhart CB
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 11652255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
Kline S
J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific misconduct. ORI report tracks gun-shy feds.
Kaiser J
Science; 1999 May; 284(5416):901. PubMed ID: 10357668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific misconduct. HHS is still looking for a definition.
Kaiser J
Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5269):1735. PubMed ID: 8650565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific misconduct. Ill-defined, redefined.
Palca J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):4. PubMed ID: 8891701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An end to fraud?
Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):95-6. PubMed ID: 8232562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. 'Unrealistic' misconduct plans under fire.
Wadman M
Nature; 1996 May; 381(6580):263. PubMed ID: 8692255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Study proposed on integrity of published data.
Gavaghan H
Nature; 1994 Oct; 371(6500):733. PubMed ID: 7935825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
