These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8657264)
21. 'Fraud police' face dilemma over warning medical boards. Dalton R Nature; 1996 Feb; 379(6565):480. PubMed ID: 8596620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry. Protti M J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity. Rennie D BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1726-8. PubMed ID: 9614029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. ORI finds Imanishi-Kari guilty of misconduct, proposes 10-year ban. Gavaghan H Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):391. PubMed ID: 7984221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Federal inquiry finds misconduct by a discoverer of the AIDS virus. Hilts P N Y Times Web; 1992 Dec; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Margot O'Toole's record of events. O'Toole M Nature; 1991 May; 351(6323):180-3. PubMed ID: 1645847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The fraud case that evaporated. N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Noted finding of science fraud is overturned by a federal panel. N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():1, 20. PubMed ID: 11647108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo. Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities. Wright DE Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Imanishi-Kari case. Baltimore defends paper at center of misconduct case. Stone R Science; 1995 Jul; 269(5221):157. PubMed ID: 7618074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct? Lubalin JS; Matheson JL Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):229-50. PubMed ID: 11657861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]