These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8657296)

  • 1. Less rosy view of science funding.
    Miller HI
    Nature; 1996 Jul; 382(6586):18. PubMed ID: 8657296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinton proposes $2.8 billion increase in science funding.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2000 Jan; 403(6768):349. PubMed ID: 10667757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. U.S. research funding. Science adviser says that pruning is the key to a healthy budget.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2007 Feb; 315(5814):927. PubMed ID: 17303728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 1997 budget confirms US science faces a period of flat funding.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1996 Mar; 380(6571):187. PubMed ID: 8637559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Big money, little science?
    Nat Immunol; 2008 Nov; 9(11):1199. PubMed ID: 18936775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinton's farewell gift to US science agencies.
    Macilwain C; Reichhardt T; Smaglik P
    Nature; 2000 Feb; 403(6770):585. PubMed ID: 10688168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Election impasse leaves science in the dark.
    Reichhardt T; Smaglik P
    Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6810):279. PubMed ID: 11099007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. U.S. science funding. Research catches a break in catch-all spending bill.
    Mervis J; Lawler A; Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Dec; 302(5651):1636-7. PubMed ID: 14657461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinton budget proposes science funding freeze.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1994 Feb; 367(6463):497. PubMed ID: 8107811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flat NIH funding threatens scientific progress.
    J Nucl Med; 2007 May; 48(5):15N, 22N. PubMed ID: 17475944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. U.S. science budget. Science agencies caught in postelection spending squeeze.
    Lawler A; Mervis J
    Science; 2004 Dec; 306(5702):1662-3. PubMed ID: 15576575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Science policy. Caught in the squeeze.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2005 Feb; 307(5711):832-4. PubMed ID: 15705818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. U.S. budget 2009. A science budget of choices and chances.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5864):714-5. PubMed ID: 18258869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Research funding. Are epigeneticists ready for big science?
    Pennisi E
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5867):1177. PubMed ID: 18309057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speak up for science funding.
    Leshner AI; Woolley M
    Science; 2012 Nov; 338(6108):722. PubMed ID: 23139298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Funding mechanisms for research through the National Cancer Institute.
    Clifford CK
    Cancer Res; 1993 May; 53(10 Suppl):2434s-2435s. PubMed ID: 8485731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. U.S. science policy. GOP takes Senate, budget uncertain.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5597):1313. PubMed ID: 12434024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NIH funding: what does the future look like?
    Avantaggiati ML
    Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):198-200; author reply 198-200. PubMed ID: 17436448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NIH funding: what does the future look like?
    Furcht LT
    Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):198-200; author reply 198-200. PubMed ID: 17431152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. U.S. science policy. Nobelists go four-on-one with Cheney.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5650):1487. PubMed ID: 14645816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.