139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8657463)
1. Hepatic spiral CT in children: scan delay time-enhancement analysis.
Luker GD; Siegel MJ; Bradley DA; Baty JD
Pediatr Radiol; 1996; 26(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 8657463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Moderate versus high concentration of contrast material for aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast at multi-detector row CT.
Awai K; Inoue M; Yagyu Y; Watanabe M; Sano T; Nin S; Koike R; Nishimura Y; Yamashita Y
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):682-8. PubMed ID: 15486215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement.
Small WC; Nelson RC; Bernardino ME; Brummer LT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 8010255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hepatic spiral CT: reduction of dose of intravenous contrast material.
Brink JA; Heiken JP; Forman HP; Sagel SS; Molina PL; Brown PC
Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 7568859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of contrast concentration on abdominal enhancement in the rabbit: spiral computed tomography evaluation.
Bluemke DA; Fishman EK; Anderson JH
Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 9419553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The optimal temporal window for CT of the liver using a time-density analysis: implications for helical (spiral) CT.
Silverman PM; Cooper C; Trock B; Garra BS; Davros WJ; Zeman RK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 7822552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose requirements for a nonionic contrast agent for spiral computed tomography of the liver in rabbits.
Bluemke DA; Fishman EK; Anderson JH
Invest Radiol; 1994 Feb; 29(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 8169097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast medium injection optimisation in spiral CT for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
Gattoni F; Tagliaferri B; Scali P; Brioschi S; Boioli F
Radiol Med; 2003; 105(5-6):416-24. PubMed ID: 12949452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Individual Optimization of Contrast Media Injection Protocol at Hepatic Dynamic Computed Tomography Using Patient-Specific Contrast Enhancement Optimizer.
Matsumoto Y; Higaki T; Arataki K; Masuda T; Sato T; Fukumoto W; Nakamura Y; Tatsugami F; Awai K
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 32195801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast material injection for hepatic helical computed tomography. Comparative study of five protocols.
Hoeffel C; Legmann P; Girardot C; Bunouf P; Mezzi K; Bonnin A
Invest Radiol; 1996 Aug; 31(8):467-71. PubMed ID: 8854192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aortic and hepatic contrast enhancement with abdominal 64-MDCT in pediatric patients: effect of body weight and iodine dose.
Bae KT; Shah AJ; Shang SS; Wang JH; Chang S; Kanematsu M; Hildebolt CF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1589-94. PubMed ID: 18941106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pancreas: patient body weight tailored contrast material injection protocol versus fixed dose protocol at dynamic CT.
Yanaga Y; Awai K; Nakayama Y; Nakaura T; Tamura Y; Hatemura M; Yamashita Y
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 17890356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of focal liver lesions at biphasic spiral CT: randomized double-blind study of the effect of iodine concentration in contrast materials.
Hänninen EL; Vogl TJ; Felfe R; Pegios W; Balzer J; Clauss W; Felix R
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):403-9. PubMed ID: 10924561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing liver contrast in helical liver CT: value of a real-time bolus-triggering technique.
Dinkel HP; Fieger M; Knüpffer J; Moll R; Schindler G
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(9):1608-12. PubMed ID: 9866771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of rate of contrast medium injection on hepatic enhancement at CT.
Garcia PA; Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Liang L; Reinhold C; Atri M
Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 8633144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hepatic enhancement during helical CT: a comparison of moderate rate uniphasic and biphasic contrast injection protocols.
Birnbaum BA; Jacobs JE; Yin D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 7676980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the head and neck: comparison of contrast material injection rates.
Groell R; Willfurth P; Schaffler GJ; Mayer R; Schmidt F; Uggowitzer MM; Tillich M; Genser B
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1999 Oct; 20(9):1732-6. PubMed ID: 10543650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast: analysis of the effect of different concentrations of contrast material at multi-detector row helical CT.
Awai K; Takada K; Onishi H; Hori S
Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):757-63. PubMed ID: 12202710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spiral computed tomography of the liver: contrast agent pharmacokinetics and the potential for improved hepatic enhancement.
Polger M; Seltzer SE; Head BL; Savci G; Silverman SG; Adams DF
Acad Radiol; 1995 Jan; 2(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 9419519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
