These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8657600)

  • 21. Pathologic findings of latissimus dorsi muscle graft in dynamic cardiomyoplasty: clinical implications.
    Misawa Y; Mott BD; Lough JO; Chiu RC
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 1997 Jun; 16(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 9229287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Dynamic cardiomyoplasty: current status and future perspective].
    Chiu RC; Misawa Y; Hasegawa T; Fuse K
    Rinsho Kyobu Geka; 1994 Dec; 14(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 9423128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Electrocautery-induced pacemaker malfunction during surgery.
    Mangar D; Atlas GM; Kane PB
    Can J Anaesth; 1991 Jul; 38(5):616-8. PubMed ID: 1934215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical study of the effects of latissimus dorsi muscle flap stimulation after cardiomyoplasty.
    Hagège AA; Desnos M; Fernandez F; Besse B; Mirochnik N; Castaldo M; Chachques JC; Carpentier A; Guérot C
    Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(9 Suppl):II210-5. PubMed ID: 7586411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bacterial infection of cardiomyostimulator abdominal pocket following cardiomyoplasty procedure: an original approach to preserve synchronous muscle stimulation.
    Lorusso R; Curnis A; Struble C; Sandrelli L; Alfieri O
    J Card Surg; 1995 Jul; 10(4 Pt 1):358-62. PubMed ID: 7549195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Cardiomyoplasty. Experimental bases, operative technic, indications].
    Chachques JC; Grandjean PA; Perier P; Nataf P; Acar C; Mihaileanu S; Bensasson D; Kieffer JP; Abry B; Fabiani JN
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1989 Jun; 82(6):919-26. PubMed ID: 2502964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Management of pacing system related complications in patients undergoing dynamic cardiomyoplasty.
    Lorusso R; Struble C; Bianchetti F; Marchini A; Curnis A; Alfieri O
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Jan; 22(1 Pt 1):116-8. PubMed ID: 9990609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cardiomyoplasty: first clinical case with new cardiomyostimulator.
    Chekanov VS; Sands DE; Brown CS; Brum F; Arzuaga P; Gava S; Eugenio FP; Melamed V; Spencer HW
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2002 Sep; 10(3):264-6. PubMed ID: 12213756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Beat-to-beat analysis of left ventricular pressure-volume relation and stroke volume by conductance catheter and aortic Modelflow in cardiomyoplasty patients.
    Schreuder JJ; van der Veen FH; van der Velde ET; Delahaye F; Alfieri O; Jegaden O; Lorusso R; Jansen JR; van Ommen V; Finet G
    Circulation; 1995 Apr; 91(7):2010-7. PubMed ID: 7895360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of prosthetic cardiac binding and adynamic cardiomyoplasty in a model of dilated cardiomyopathy.
    Oh JH; Badhwar V; Mott BD; Li CM; Chiu RC
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1998 Jul; 116(1):148-53. PubMed ID: 9671909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radiofrequency Scanning for Retained Surgical Items Can Cause Electromagnetic Interference and Pacing Inhibition if an Asynchronous Pacing Mode Is Not Applied.
    Plakke MJ; Maisonave Y; Daley SM
    A A Case Rep; 2016 Mar; 6(6):143-5. PubMed ID: 26491842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Electromagnetic interference of endodontic equipments with cardiovascular implantable electronic device.
    Dadalti MT; da Cunha AJ; de Araújo MC; de Moraes LG; Risso Pde A
    J Dent; 2016 Mar; 46():68-72. PubMed ID: 26765669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reverse remodeling from cardiomyoplasty in human heart failure. External constraint versus active assist.
    Kass DA; Baughman KL; Pak PH; Cho PW; Levin HR; Gardner TJ; Halperin HR; Tsitlik JE; Acker MA
    Circulation; 1995 May; 91(9):2314-8. PubMed ID: 7729016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pacemaker sensitivity to 50 Hz noise voltages.
    Irnich W; Steen-Mueller MK
    Europace; 2011 Sep; 13(9):1319-26. PubMed ID: 21551474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dynamic cardiomyoplasty in patients with end-stage heart failure: anaesthetic considerations.
    Lehmann A; Faust K; Boldt J; Lang J; Thaler E; Werling C
    Br J Anaesth; 1999 Jan; 82(1):140-3. PubMed ID: 10325853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Noise reversion of a dual chamber pacemaker without noise.
    Fröhlig G; Dyckmans J; Doenecke P; Sen S; Bette L
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1986 Sep; 9(5):690-6. PubMed ID: 2429275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Risk of electromagnetic interference induced by dental equipment on cardiac implantable electrical devices.
    Miranda-Rius J; Lahor-Soler E; Brunet-Llobet L; Sabaté de la Cruz X
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2016 Dec; 124(6):559-565. PubMed ID: 27748971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dynamic cardiomyoplasty: perspectives on nursing care and collaborative management.
    Vollman MW
    Prog Cardiovasc Nurs; 1995; 10(2):15-22. PubMed ID: 7651945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Demand dynamic cardiomyoplasty: mechanograms prove incomplete transformation of the rested latissimus dorsi.
    Carraro U; Barbiero M; Docali G; Cotogni A; Rigatelli G; Casarotto D; Muneretto C
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2000 Jul; 70(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 10921684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electromagnetic interference with implantable cardiac pacemakers by video capsule.
    Dubner S; Dubner Y; Gallino S; Spallone L; Zagalsky D; Rubio H; Zimmerman J; Goldin E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Feb; 61(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 15729234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.