122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8657944)
1. Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography: two- versus three-dimensional techniques. Work in progress.
Hara AK; Johnson CD; Reed JE; Ehman RL; Ilstrup DM
Radiology; 1996 Jul; 200(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 8657944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visualization of colorectal polyps with spiral CT colography: evaluation of processing parameters with perspective volume rendering.
McFarland EG; Brink JA; Loh J; Wang G; Argiro V; Balfe DM; Heiken JP; Vannier MW
Radiology; 1997 Dec; 205(3):701-7. PubMed ID: 9393524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Colorectal lesions: evaluation with CT colography.
Hara AK; Johnson CD; Reed JE
Radiographics; 1997; 17(5):1157-67; discussion 1167-8. PubMed ID: 9308108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity.
Hara AK; Johnson CD; Reed JE; Ahlquist DA; Nelson H; MacCarty RL; Harmsen WS; Ilstrup DM
Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 9314963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Small simulated polyps in pig colon: sensitivity of CT virtual colography.
Dachman AH; Lieberman J; Osnis RB; Chen SY; Hoffmann KR; Chen CT; Newmark GM; McGill J
Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):427-30. PubMed ID: 9114099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy).
Rex DK; Vining D; Kopecky KK
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Sep; 50(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 10462648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps.
Macari M; Milano A; Lavelle M; Berman P; Megibow AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1543-9. PubMed ID: 10845478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation.
Royster AP; Fenlon HM; Clarke PD; Nunes DP; Ferrucci JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1237-42. PubMed ID: 9353434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spiral CT colonography: reader agreement and diagnostic performance with two- and three-dimensional image-display techniques.
McFarland EG; Brink JA; Pilgram TK; Heiken JP; Balfe DM; Hirselj DA; Weinstock L; Littenberg B
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):375-83. PubMed ID: 11161149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Display modes for CT colonography. Part I. Synthesis and insertion of polyps into patient CT data.
Karadi C; Beaulieu CF; Jeffrey RB; Paik DS; Napel S
Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):195-201. PubMed ID: 10405742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of axial, coronal, and primary 3D review in MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps: a phantom study.
Mang T; Schaefer-Prokop C; Schima W; Maier A; Schober E; Mueller-Mang C; Weber M; Prokop M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 18221849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Helical CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): the challenge that exists between advancing technology and generalizability.
McFarland EG; Brink JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Sep; 173(3):549-59. PubMed ID: 10470878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colography: feasibility of a novel technique.
Hara AK; Johnson CD; Reed JE; Ahlquist DA; Nelson H; Ehman RL; McCollough CH; Ilstrup DM
Gastroenterology; 1996 Jan; 110(1):284-90. PubMed ID: 8536869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detectability of small and flat polyps in MDCT colonography using 2D and 3D imaging tools: results from a phantom study.
Mang TG; Schaefer-Prokop C; Maier A; Schober E; Lechner G; Prokop M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Dec; 185(6):1582-9. PubMed ID: 16304017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Motion - computerized tomographic colography is a better method for screening for polyps: arguments against the motion.
Simon JB
Can J Gastroenterol; 2003 Feb; 17(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 12605253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Display modes for CT colonography. Part II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies.
Beaulieu CF; Jeffrey RB; Karadi C; Paik DS; Napel S
Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):203-12. PubMed ID: 10405743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of collimation, pitch, and orientation on polyp detection in a human colectomy specimen.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Bartram CI; Morgan PR; Talbot IC; Fry N; Saunders BP; Khosraviani K; Atkin W
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 14519872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study.
Summers RM; Beaulieu CF; Pusanik LM; Malley JD; Jeffrey RB; Glazer DI; Napel S
Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):284-90. PubMed ID: 10887263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography.
Hara AK; Johnson CD; Reed JE; Ahlquist DA; Nelson H; Ehman RL; Harmsen WS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1181-4. PubMed ID: 9129408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
