These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8658023)

  • 41. Attenuation performance of four hearing protectors under dynamic movement and different user fitting conditions.
    Casali JG; Park MY
    Hum Factors; 1990 Feb; 32(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 2376410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A psychophysical evaluation of the dependence of hearing protector attenuation on noise level.
    Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):297-311. PubMed ID: 6826899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Koehnke J; Culotta CP; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 8549890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Gender differences in real-world hearing protector attenuation.
    Abel SM; Alberti PW; Rokas D
    J Otolaryngol; 1988 Apr; 17(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 3385873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.
    van Hoesel RJ; Tyler RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1617-30. PubMed ID: 12656396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Horizontal sound localization skills of unilaterally hearing-impaired children.
    Humes LE; Allen SK; Bess FH
    Audiology; 1980; 19(6):508-18. PubMed ID: 7425955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Bilateral use of active middle ear implants: speech discrimination results in noise.
    Wolf-Magele A; Koci V; Schnabl J; Zorowka P; Riechelmann H; Sprinzl GM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 273(8):2065-72. PubMed ID: 26385811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Measurement of noise protection in functional magnetic resonance imaging].
    Liener K; Wunderlich A; Ehret G; Bachor E
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Feb; 84(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 15712046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Learning to localize a broadband tonal complex signal with advanced hearing protectors and TCAPS: the effectiveness of training on open-ear vs. device-occluded performance.
    Lee K; Casali JG
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Feb; 58(sup1):S65-S73. PubMed ID: 30596525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessment of noise exposure for indoor and outdoor firing ranges.
    Murphy WJ; Tubbs RL
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Sep; 4(9):688-97. PubMed ID: 17654224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison between bilateral cochlear implants and Neurelec Digisonic(®) SP Binaural cochlear implant: speech perception, sound localization and patient self-assessment.
    Bonnard D; Lautissier S; Bosset-Audoit A; Coriat G; Beraha M; Maunoury A; Martel J; Darrouzet V; Bébéar JP; Dauman R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2013; 18(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 23548561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects on sound localization of configuration and type of hearing impairment.
    Noble W; Byrne D; Lepage B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):992-1005. PubMed ID: 8132913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effects of user training with electronically-modulated sound transmission hearing protectors and the open ear on horizontal localization ability.
    Casali JG; Robinette MB
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54 Suppl 1():S37-45. PubMed ID: 25549166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of aided hearing in the nonimplanted ear on bimodal hearing.
    Jang JH; Lee JH; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):e270-6. PubMed ID: 25153664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Attenuating properties of hearing protectors in versus time factor.
    Kotarbińska E
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2003; 16(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 12705720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Minimum audible movement angle in the horizontal plane as a function of stimulus frequency and bandwidth, source azimuth, and velocity.
    Chandler DW; Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Mar; 91(3):1624-36. PubMed ID: 1564199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Acuity of sound localisation: a topography of auditory space. III. Monaural hearing conditions.
    Oldfield SR; Parker SP
    Perception; 1986; 15(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 3774479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effectiveness in Rehabilitation of Current Wireless CROS Technology in Experienced Bone-Anchored Implant Users.
    Snapp HA; Hoffer ME; Liu X; Rajguru SM
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):1397-1404. PubMed ID: 29135863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Speech intelligibility in noise: effects of fluency and hearing protector type.
    Abel SM; Alberti PW; Haythornthwaite C; Riko K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Mar; 71(3):708-15. PubMed ID: 7085974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.