These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 86581)

  • 1. BioPEPR: a system for the automatic prescreening of cervical smears.
    Zahniser DJ; Oud PS; Raaijmakers MC; Vooys GP; Van de Walle RT
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1979 Jan; 27(1):635-41. PubMed ID: 86581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Field test results using the BioPEPR cervical smear prescreening system.
    Zahniser DJ; Oud PS; Raaijmakers MC; Vooys GP; Van de Walle RT
    Cytometry; 1980 Nov; 1(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 7021104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thionine-Feulgen-Congo red staining of cervical smears for the BioPEPR image-analysis system.
    Oud PS; Zahniser DJ; Raaijmakers MC; Vooijs PG; Van de Walle RT
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Dec; 3(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 6174058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Pairwuti S
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flow cytometric prescreening of cervical smears.
    Linden WA; Ochlich K; Baisch H; Scholz KU; Mauss HJ; Stegner HE; Joshi DS; Wu CT; Koprowska I; Nicolini C
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1979 Jan; 27(1):529-35. PubMed ID: 86573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative cytology of the positive region in flow sorted vaginal smears.
    Goerttler K; Stöhr M
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1979 Jan; 27(1):567-72. PubMed ID: 374622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Upgrading unsatisfactory cervical smears with the MiB-1 method.
    Boon ME; Kleinschmidt-Guy ED; Wijsman-Grootendorst A; Hoogeveen MM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Nov; 15(4):270-6. PubMed ID: 8982579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PAPNET for analysis of proliferating (MIB-1 positive) cell populations in cervical smears.
    Boon ME; Kleinschmidt-Guy ED; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E
    Eur J Morphol; 1994 Mar; 32(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 8086271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Papanicolaou staining and Feulgen staining for automated prescreening.
    Soost HJ; Brem W; Höbel W; Otto K; Schwarz G
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1983 Mar; 5(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 6189437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears.
    Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Boon ME
    Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(6):801-4. PubMed ID: 3059733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DNA-cytometric diagnosis of prospective malignancy in borderline lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Böcking A; Hilgarth M; Auffermann W; Hack-Werdier C; Fischer-Becker D; von Kalkreuth G
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 3466496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cytophotometric study of premalignant and malignant cells of the cervix in an approach towards automated cytology.
    Nishiya I; Kikuchi T; Moriya S; Shimotomai K; Sawamura I
    Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(2):271-5. PubMed ID: 266337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. False positive cervical smears: a cytometric and histological study.
    Nenning H; Horn LC; Kühndel K; Bilek K
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Jul; 9(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 7577756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. LEYTAS analysis of cytological specimens: the results of thousand cervical smears.
    Goyarts-Veldstra L; van Driel-Kulker AM; Ploem-Zaaijer JJ; Meyer F; Ploem JS
    Microsc Acta Suppl; 1983; 6():147-60. PubMed ID: 6578401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Value of duplicate smears in cervical cytology.
    Davis JR; Hindman WM; Paplanus SH; Trego DC; Wiens JL; Suciu TN
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 6945018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The occurrence of isolated dysplastic and carcinoma in situ type cells in cervical smears from patients with dysplasia and carcinoma in situ: significance to prescreening using image processing techniques.
    Feldman M; Poulsen R; Shepherd L; Marshall KG
    Acta Cytol; 1973; 17(5):395-400. PubMed ID: 4517951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The significance of cervical cytologic dysplasia.
    Jordan SW; Smith NL; Dike LS
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 6942614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The preparation of cervical scrape material for automated cytology using gallocyanin chrome-alum stain.
    Eason PJ; Tucker JH
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1979 Jan; 27(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 86562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An image analysis system for cervical cytology automation using nuclear DNA content.
    Tucker JH
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1979 Jan; 27(1):613-20. PubMed ID: 374629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.