191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8658151)
1. Imanishi-Kari ruling slams ORI.
Kaiser J; Marshall E
Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5270):1864-5. PubMed ID: 8658151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Imanishi-Kari case: ORI finds fraud.
Stone R; Marshall E
Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5190):1468-9. PubMed ID: 7985007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. ORI finds Imanishi-Kari guilty of misconduct, proposes 10-year ban.
Gavaghan H
Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):391. PubMed ID: 7984221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How congressional pressure shaped the 'Baltimore case'.
Friedly J
Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5277):873-5. PubMed ID: 8711476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo.
Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Imanishi-Kari case. Baltimore defends paper at center of misconduct case.
Stone R
Science; 1995 Jul; 269(5221):157. PubMed ID: 7618074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Imanishi-Kari case. Marathon hearing gets under way.
Mervis J
Science; 1995 Jun; 268(5217):1561. PubMed ID: 7777851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clearing of researcher in 'Baltimore affair' boosts demand for reforms.
Steele F
Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):719-20. PubMed ID: 8657264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct. ORI report tracks gun-shy feds.
Kaiser J
Science; 1999 May; 284(5416):901. PubMed ID: 10357668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The assault on David Baltimore.
Kevles DJ
New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A costly settlement ends whistle-blower suit.
Taubes G
Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):605. PubMed ID: 8303265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.
Pascal CB
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Appeals board exonerates Baltimore, Imanishi-Kari.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1996 Jul 24-31; 276(4):266. PubMed ID: 8656524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific misconduct in US health service.
Choo V
Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1359. PubMed ID: 11644692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Resounding echoes of Gallo case.
Greenberg DS
Lancet; 1995 Mar; 345(8950):639. PubMed ID: 7898185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific misconduct. Hearing process proves a challenge for ORI.
Anderson C
Science; 1993 Jun; 260(5115):1714. PubMed ID: 8390094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Misconduct finding in the Gallo case.
Greenberg D
Lancet; 1993 Jan; 341(8838):166-7. PubMed ID: 8093759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Margot O'Toole's record of events.
O'Toole M
Nature; 1991 May; 351(6323):180-3. PubMed ID: 1645847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving the scientific misconduct hearing process.
Parrish DM
JAMA; 1997 Apr 23-30; 277(16):1315-9. PubMed ID: 9109472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Giving scientists their due. The Imanishi-Kari decision.
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 9219021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
