These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8658250)
1. Flexion failure of posterior cervical lateral mass screws. Influence of insertion technique and position. Choueka J; Spivak JM; Kummer FJ; Steger T Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Feb; 21(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 8658250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative anatomic evaluation of cervical lateral mass fixation with a comparison of the Roy-Camille and the Magerl screw techniques. Barrey C; Mertens P; Jund J; Cotton F; Perrin G Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Mar; 30(6):E140-7. PubMed ID: 15770166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation. Hostin RA; Wu C; Perra JH; Polly DW; Akesen B; Wroblewski JM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2415-21. PubMed ID: 18923316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of cervical lateral mass fixation: a comparison of the Roy-Camille and Magerl screw techniques. Barrey C; Mertens P; Rumelhart C; Cotton F; Jund J; Perrin G J Neurosurg; 2004 Mar; 100(3 Suppl Spine):268-76. PubMed ID: 15029915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lateral radiologic evaluation of lateral mass screw placement in the cervical spine. Ebraheim NA; Tremains MR; Xu R; Yeasting RA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Feb; 23(4):458-62. PubMed ID: 9516701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safe lateral-mass screw lengths in the Roy-Camille and Magerl techniques. An anatomic study. Ebraheim NA; Klausner T; Xu R; Yeasting RA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Aug; 23(16):1739-42. PubMed ID: 9728374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative anatomy of subaxial cervical lateral mass: an analysis of safe screw lengths for Roy-Camille and magerl techniques. Stemper BD; Marawar SV; Yoganandan N; Shender BS; Rao RD Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(8):893-7. PubMed ID: 18404109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors affecting lateral mass screw placement at C-7. Abdullah KG; Nowacki AS; Steinmetz MP; Wang JC; Mroz TE J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 21235304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Insertional Torque in Cervical Vertebrae Lateral Mass Screw Fixation: Magerl Technique Versus Roy-Camille Technique. Shinohara A; Sairyo K; Mishiro T; Chikawa T; Soshi S Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Oct; 30(8):E1156-E1159. PubMed ID: 27623298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique. Maki S; Aramomi M; Matsuura Y; Furuya T; Ota M; Iijima Y; Saito J; Suzuki T; Mannoji C; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Koda M J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):415-420. PubMed ID: 28498072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation in spine tumors. Mazel C; Hoffmann E; Antonietti P; Grunenwald D; Henry M; Williams J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jun; 29(11):1246-53. PubMed ID: 15167665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomical and morphometric studies in posterior cervical spinal screw-plate systems. Jónsson H; Rauschning W J Spinal Disord; 1994 Oct; 7(5):429-38. PubMed ID: 7819643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anatomic consideration for standard and modified techniques of cervical lateral mass screw placement. Merola AA; Castro BA; Alongi PR; Mathur S; Brkaric M; Vigna F; Riina JP; Gorup J; Haher TR Spine J; 2002; 2(6):430-5. PubMed ID: 14589267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of three different cervical lateral mass screw fixation techniques by complications and bicortical purchase : cadaveric study. Baek JW; Park DM; Kim DH J Korean Neurosurg Soc; 2010 Sep; 48(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 21082044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stabilization of subaxial cervical spines by lateral mass screw fixation with modified Magerl's technique. Wu JC; Huang WC; Chen YC; Shih YH; Cheng H Surg Neurol; 2008 Dec; 70 Suppl 1():S1:25-33; discussion S1:33. PubMed ID: 19061767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of cervical posterior lateral mass screw placement by oblique radiographs. Xu R; Robke J; Ebraheim NA; Yeasting RA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Mar; 21(6):696-701. PubMed ID: 8882691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A biomechanical study of a cervical spine stabilization device: Roy-Camille plates. Smith ME; Cibischino M; Langrana NA; Lee CK; Parsons JR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jan; 22(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 9122780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anatomic comparison of the Roy-Camille and Magerl techniques for screw placement in the lower cervical spine. Heller JG; Carlson GD; Abitbol JJ; Garfin SR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1991 Oct; 16(10 Suppl):S552-7. PubMed ID: 1801271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of transfacet screws to lateral mass screw-rod constructs in the lower cervical spine. Tong J; Ji W; Zhou R; Huang Z; Liu S; Zhu Q Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1787-93. PubMed ID: 26530298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]