333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8658250)
1. Flexion failure of posterior cervical lateral mass screws. Influence of insertion technique and position.
Choueka J; Spivak JM; Kummer FJ; Steger T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Feb; 21(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 8658250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative anatomic evaluation of cervical lateral mass fixation with a comparison of the Roy-Camille and the Magerl screw techniques.
Barrey C; Mertens P; Jund J; Cotton F; Perrin G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Mar; 30(6):E140-7. PubMed ID: 15770166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation.
Hostin RA; Wu C; Perra JH; Polly DW; Akesen B; Wroblewski JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2415-21. PubMed ID: 18923316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of cervical lateral mass fixation: a comparison of the Roy-Camille and Magerl screw techniques.
Barrey C; Mertens P; Rumelhart C; Cotton F; Jund J; Perrin G
J Neurosurg; 2004 Mar; 100(3 Suppl Spine):268-76. PubMed ID: 15029915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lateral radiologic evaluation of lateral mass screw placement in the cervical spine.
Ebraheim NA; Tremains MR; Xu R; Yeasting RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Feb; 23(4):458-62. PubMed ID: 9516701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safe lateral-mass screw lengths in the Roy-Camille and Magerl techniques. An anatomic study.
Ebraheim NA; Klausner T; Xu R; Yeasting RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Aug; 23(16):1739-42. PubMed ID: 9728374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative anatomy of subaxial cervical lateral mass: an analysis of safe screw lengths for Roy-Camille and magerl techniques.
Stemper BD; Marawar SV; Yoganandan N; Shender BS; Rao RD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(8):893-7. PubMed ID: 18404109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors affecting lateral mass screw placement at C-7.
Abdullah KG; Nowacki AS; Steinmetz MP; Wang JC; Mroz TE
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 21235304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Insertional Torque in Cervical Vertebrae Lateral Mass Screw Fixation: Magerl Technique Versus Roy-Camille Technique.
Shinohara A; Sairyo K; Mishiro T; Chikawa T; Soshi S
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Oct; 30(8):E1156-E1159. PubMed ID: 27623298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique.
Maki S; Aramomi M; Matsuura Y; Furuya T; Ota M; Iijima Y; Saito J; Suzuki T; Mannoji C; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Koda M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):415-420. PubMed ID: 28498072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation in spine tumors.
Mazel C; Hoffmann E; Antonietti P; Grunenwald D; Henry M; Williams J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jun; 29(11):1246-53. PubMed ID: 15167665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomical and morphometric studies in posterior cervical spinal screw-plate systems.
Jónsson H; Rauschning W
J Spinal Disord; 1994 Oct; 7(5):429-38. PubMed ID: 7819643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anatomic consideration for standard and modified techniques of cervical lateral mass screw placement.
Merola AA; Castro BA; Alongi PR; Mathur S; Brkaric M; Vigna F; Riina JP; Gorup J; Haher TR
Spine J; 2002; 2(6):430-5. PubMed ID: 14589267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of three different cervical lateral mass screw fixation techniques by complications and bicortical purchase : cadaveric study.
Baek JW; Park DM; Kim DH
J Korean Neurosurg Soc; 2010 Sep; 48(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 21082044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical transfacet versus lateral mass screws: a biomechanical comparison.
Klekamp JW; Ugbo JL; Heller JG; Hutton WC
J Spinal Disord; 2000 Dec; 13(6):515-8. PubMed ID: 11132983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stabilization of subaxial cervical spines by lateral mass screw fixation with modified Magerl's technique.
Wu JC; Huang WC; Chen YC; Shih YH; Cheng H
Surg Neurol; 2008 Dec; 70 Suppl 1():S1:25-33; discussion S1:33. PubMed ID: 19061767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of cervical posterior lateral mass screw placement by oblique radiographs.
Xu R; Robke J; Ebraheim NA; Yeasting RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Mar; 21(6):696-701. PubMed ID: 8882691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A biomechanical study of a cervical spine stabilization device: Roy-Camille plates.
Smith ME; Cibischino M; Langrana NA; Lee CK; Parsons JR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jan; 22(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 9122780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anatomic comparison of the Roy-Camille and Magerl techniques for screw placement in the lower cervical spine.
Heller JG; Carlson GD; Abitbol JJ; Garfin SR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1991 Oct; 16(10 Suppl):S552-7. PubMed ID: 1801271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of transfacet screws to lateral mass screw-rod constructs in the lower cervical spine.
Tong J; Ji W; Zhou R; Huang Z; Liu S; Zhu Q
Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1787-93. PubMed ID: 26530298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
