These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8659358)

  • 21. Ultrasound versus radiography in the detection of soft-tissue foreign bodies.
    Manthey DE; Storrow AB; Milbourn JM; Wagner BJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 1996 Jul; 28(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 8669741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Subtle pulmonary disease: detection with computed radiography versus conventional chest radiography.
    Ishigaki T; Endo T; Ikeda M; Kono M; Yoshida S; Ikezoe J; Murata K; Matsumoto M
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 8816520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Wooden foreign bodies in soft tissue: detection at US.
    Jacobson JA; Powell A; Craig JG; Bouffard JA; van Holsbeeck MT
    Radiology; 1998 Jan; 206(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 9423650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. CT more accurately detects foreign bodies within the equine foot than MRI or digital radiography.
    Ogden NKE; Milner PI; Stack JD; Talbot AM
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2021 Mar; 62(2):225-235. PubMed ID: 33325609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ultrasonographic detection of foreign bodies in soft tissue. A human cadaver study.
    Blyme PJ; Lind T; Schantz K; Lavard P
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1990; 110(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 2288801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and hard copy of computed radiography in full and two-thirds sizes in detection of interstitial lung disease.
    Kondoh H; Ikezoe J; Inamura K; Kuroda C; Kozuka T
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 Nov; 7(4):193-5. PubMed ID: 7858016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.
    Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Beam CA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Radiology of foreign bodies: how do we image them?
    Ingraham CR; Mannelli L; Robinson JD; Linnau KF
    Emerg Radiol; 2015 Aug; 22(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 25648360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Film-screen vs. digital radiography in rheumatoid arthritis of the hand. An ROC analysis.
    Jónsson A; Borg A; Hannesson P; Herrlin K; Jonsson K; Sloth M; Petterson H
    Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 8011377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Flat-panel x-ray detector using amorphous silicon technology. Reduced radiation dose for the detection of foreign bodies.
    Völk M; Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Alexander J; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Spahn M; Feuerbach S
    Invest Radiol; 1997 Jul; 32(7):373-7. PubMed ID: 9228601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of foreign bodies in the hand.
    Bray PW; Mahoney JL; Campbell JP
    J Hand Surg Am; 1995 Jul; 20(4):661-6. PubMed ID: 7594298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography.
    Aras MH; Miloglu O; Barutcugil C; Kantarci M; Ozcan E; Harorli A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):72-8. PubMed ID: 20100917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography of the hands and feet: a subjective comparison.
    Piraino DW; Davros WJ; Lieber M; Richmond BJ; Schils JP; Recht MP; Grooff PN; Belhobek GH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 9888764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hard-copy versus soft-copy image reading for detection of ureteral stones on abdominal radiography.
    Ueda K; Iwasaki S; Nagasawa M; Sueyoshi S; Takahama J; Ide K; Kichikawa K
    Radiat Med; 2003; 21(5):210-3. PubMed ID: 14632296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiographic imaging of foreign bodies in the hand.
    Donaldson JS
    Hand Clin; 1991 Feb; 7(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 2037630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Urinary calculi on computed radiography: comparison of observer performance with hard-copy versus soft-copy images on different viewer systems.
    Kim AY; Cho KS; Song KS; Kim JH; Kim JG; Ha HK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 11461856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automatic detection of foreign objects in computed radiography.
    Xuan J; Adali T; Wang Y; Siegel E
    J Biomed Opt; 2000 Oct; 5(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 11092430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative Sensitivity Assessment of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Radiography for detecting Foreign Bodies.
    Lari SS; Shokri A; Hosseinipanah SM; Rostami S; Sabounchi SS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Mar; 17(3):224-9. PubMed ID: 27207202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of hard- and soft-copy digital chest images with different matrix sizes for managing coronary care unit patients.
    Steckel RJ; Batra P; Johnson S; Sayre J; Brown K; Haker K; Young D; Zucker M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):837-41. PubMed ID: 7726034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.