These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8659426)
1. Assessment of a technology that permits individualized scan delays on helical hepatic CT: a technique to improve efficiency in use of contrast material. Silverman PM; Roberts SC; Ducic I; Tefft MC; Olson MC; Cooper C; Zeman RK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8659426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Helical CT of the liver: clinical application of an automated computer technique, SmartPrep, for obtaining images with optimal contrast enhancement. Silverman PM; Roberts S; Tefft MC; Brown B; Fox SH; Cooper C; Zeman RK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jul; 165(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 7785637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple-phase helical CT of the liver for detecting small hepatomas in patients with liver cirrhosis: contrast-injection protocol and optimal timing. Mitsuzaki K; Yamashita Y; Ogata I; Nishiharu T; Urata J; Takahashi M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 8751695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Timing of parenchymal enhancement on dual-phase dynamic helical CT of the liver: how long does the hepatic arterial phase predominate? Frederick MG; McElaney BL; Singer A; Park KS; Paulson EK; McGee SG; Nelson RC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1305-10. PubMed ID: 8633437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-detector row helical CT of the liver: quantitative assessment of iodine concentration of intravenous contrast material on multiphasic CT--a prospective randomized study. Tsurusaki M; Sugimoto K; Fujii M; Sugimura K Radiat Med; 2004; 22(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 15468944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peak enhancement of the liver in children using power injection and helical CT. Ruess L; Bulas DI; Kushner DC; Silverman PM; Fearon TC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):677-81. PubMed ID: 9490952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hepatic enhancement during helical CT: a comparison of moderate rate uniphasic and biphasic contrast injection protocols. Birnbaum BA; Jacobs JE; Yin D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 7676980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times. Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing contrast enhancement during helical CT of the liver: a comparison of two bolus tracking techniques. Schweiger GD; Chang PJ; Brown BP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Dec; 171(6):1551-8. PubMed ID: 9843287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement. Small WC; Nelson RC; Bernardino ME; Brummer LT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 8010255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MDCT of the pancreas: optimizing scanning delay with a bolus-tracking technique for pancreatic, peripancreatic vascular, and hepatic contrast enhancement. Kondo H; Kanematsu M; Goshima S; Miyoshi T; Shiratori Y; Onozuka M; Moriyama N; Bae KT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):751-6. PubMed ID: 17312064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effect of different threshold levels and injection rates on hepatic enhancement by using bolus tracking technique in helical CT]. Erdoğan C; Savci G Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Jun; 9(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 14661491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of tailored and empiric scan delays for CT angiography of the abdomen. Sheiman RG; Raptopoulos V; Caruso P; Vrachliotis T; Pearlman J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):725-9. PubMed ID: 8751690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conspicuity of hepatic metastases on helical CT: effect of different time delays between contrast administration and scanning. Silverman PM; O'Malley J; Tefft MC; Cooper C; Zeman RK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Mar; 164(3):619-23. PubMed ID: 7863882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effective use of low-osmolality contrast media for CT of the liver: evaluation of liver enhancement provided by various doses of iohexol. Bree RL; Parisky YR; Bernardino ME; Costello P; Leder R; Brown PC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 8079849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT arterial portography of the abdomen: effect of injecting papaverine into the mesenteric artery on hepatic contrast enhancement. Soyer P; Lacheheb D; Levesque M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jun; 160(6):1213-5. PubMed ID: 8498218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast material injection for hepatic helical computed tomography. Comparative study of five protocols. Hoeffel C; Legmann P; Girardot C; Bunouf P; Mezzi K; Bonnin A Invest Radiol; 1996 Aug; 31(8):467-71. PubMed ID: 8854192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hepatic enhancement analysis in children using smart prep monitoring for 2 : 1 pitch helical scanning. Vade A; Olson MC; Vittore CP; Subbaiah P Pediatr Radiol; 1999 Sep; 29(9):689-93. PubMed ID: 10460331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing liver contrast in helical liver CT: value of a real-time bolus-triggering technique. Dinkel HP; Fieger M; Knüpffer J; Moll R; Schindler G Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(9):1608-12. PubMed ID: 9866771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT. Tublin ME; Tessler FN; Cheng SL; Peters TL; McGovern PC Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]