BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8659475)

  • 1. Identification of condylar anatomy affects the evaluation of mandibular growth: guidelines for accurate reporting and research.
    Ghafari J; Jacobsson-Hunt U; Higgins-Barber K; Beideman RW; Shofer FS; Laster LL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jun; 109(6):645-52. PubMed ID: 8659475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of landmark identification on cephalometric measurements: guidelines for cephalometric analyses.
    Perillo M; Beideman R; Shofer F; Jacobsson-Hunt U; Higgins-Barber K; Laster L; Ghafari J
    Clin Orthod Res; 2000 Feb; 3(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 11168282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The validity of two methods of mandibular superimposition: a comparison with tantalum implants.
    Springate SD; Jones AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Mar; 113(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 9517716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurements of mandibular length: a comparison of articulare vs condylion.
    Haas DW; Martinez DF; Eckert GJ; Diers NR
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 11407774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of efficacy of functional appliances on mandibular growth.
    Chen JY; Will LA; Niederman R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 12439474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linear mandibular measurements: comparison between orthopantomograms and lateral cephalograms.
    Ongkosuwito EM; Dieleman MM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Mulder PG; van Neck JW
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 Mar; 46(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 19254052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.
    Ghoneima A; Albarakati S; Baysal A; Uysal T; Kula K
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23304973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Craniofacial structure of Anatolian Turkish adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.
    Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Buyukerkmen A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Mar; 125(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 15014417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric evaluation of condylar and mandibular growth modification: a review.
    Shen G; Darendeliler MA
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2006 Feb; 9(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 16420269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The accuracy of measuring condylion location.
    Moore RN; DuBois LM; Boice PA; Igel KA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Apr; 95(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 2705415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch?
    El Haje OA; Pompeo DD; Furtado GC; Rivera LM; Paranhos LR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 25825099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An investigation of mandibular morphology in subjects with different vertical facial growth patterns.
    Eröz UB; Ceylan I; Aydemir S
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Mar; 16(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 11201956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longitudinal observation of mandibular motion pattern in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion subsequent to orthognathic surgery.
    Wen-Ching Ko E; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e158-68. PubMed ID: 22260918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential growth of the female face in the anteroposterior dimension.
    Nanda SK
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 1554159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association between facial height development and mandibular growth rotation in low and high MP-SN angle faces: a longitudinal study.
    Karlsen AT
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 9107374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vertical facial growth: a longitudinal study from 7 to 14 years of age.
    van der Beek MC; Hoeksma JB; Prahl-Andersen B
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Jun; 13(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 1936138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Effective condylar growth" and chin position changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic long-term study.
    Pancherz H; Ruf S; Kohlhas P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Oct; 114(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 9790329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of the cephalometric reference point condylion on lateral head films.
    Forsberg CM; Odenrick L
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 2729665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of extraoral lateral force loading on the mandible in the mandibular development of growing rats.
    Ishii T; Yamaguchi H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):782-91. PubMed ID: 19061805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.