These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8662007)

  • 1. 18S rRNA suggests that Entoprocta are protostomes, unrelated to Ectoprocta.
    Mackey LY; Winnepenninckx B; De Wachter R; Backeljau T; Emschermann P; Garey JR
    J Mol Evol; 1996 May; 42(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 8662007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phylogenomic analyses of lophophorates (brachiopods, phoronids and bryozoans) confirm the Lophotrochozoa concept.
    Helmkampf M; Bruchhaus I; Hausdorf B
    Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Aug; 275(1645):1927-33. PubMed ID: 18495619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phylogenetic relationships within the lophophorate lineages (Ectoprocta, Brachiopoda and Phoronida).
    Hausdorf B; Helmkampf M; Nesnidal MP; Bruchhaus I
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2010 Jun; 55(3):1121-7. PubMed ID: 20045074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complete mitochondrial genome of Bugula neritina (Bryozoa, Gymnolaemata, Cheilostomata): phylogenetic position of Bryozoa and phylogeny of lophophorates within the Lophotrochozoa.
    Jang KH; Hwang UW
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Apr; 10():167. PubMed ID: 19379522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New phylogenomic data support the monophyly of Lophophorata and an Ectoproct-Phoronid clade and indicate that Polyzoa and Kryptrochozoa are caused by systematic bias.
    Nesnidal MP; Helmkampf M; Meyer A; Witek A; Bruchhaus I; Ebersberger I; Hankeln T; Lieb B; Struck TH; Hausdorf B
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Nov; 13():253. PubMed ID: 24238092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monophyly of brachiopods and phoronids: reconciliation of molecular evidence with Linnaean classification (the subphylum Phoroniformea nov.).
    Cohen BL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Feb; 267(1440):225-31. PubMed ID: 10714876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence from 18S ribosomal DNA that the lophophorates are protostome animals.
    Halanych KM; Bacheller JD; Aguinaldo AM; Liva SM; Hillis DM; Lake JA
    Science; 1995 Mar; 267(5204):1641-3. PubMed ID: 7886451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The phylogenetic position of entoprocta, ectoprocta, phoronida, and brachiopoda.
    Nielsen C
    Integr Comp Biol; 2002 Jul; 42(3):685-91. PubMed ID: 21708765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spiralian phylogenomics supports the resurrection of Bryozoa comprising Ectoprocta and Entoprocta.
    Hausdorf B; Helmkampf M; Meyer A; Witek A; Herlyn H; Bruchhaus I; Hankeln T; Struck TH; Lieb B
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Dec; 24(12):2723-9. PubMed ID: 17921486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The first comprehensive molecular phylogeny of Bryozoa (Ectoprocta) based on combined analyses of nuclear and mitochondrial genes.
    Fuchs J; Obst M; Sundberg P
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Jul; 52(1):225-33. PubMed ID: 19475710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multigene analysis of lophophorate and chaetognath phylogenetic relationships.
    Helmkampf M; Bruchhaus I; Hausdorf B
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 Jan; 46(1):206-14. PubMed ID: 17937996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polyzoa is back: The effect of complete gene sets on the placement of Ectoprocta and Entoprocta.
    Khalturin K; Shunatova N; Shchenkov S; Sasakura Y; Kawamitsu M; Satoh N
    Sci Adv; 2022 Jul; 8(26):eabo4400. PubMed ID: 35776797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The complete mitochondrial genome of Flustra foliacea (Ectoprocta, Cheilostomata) - compositional bias affects phylogenetic analyses of lophotrochozoan relationships.
    Nesnidal MP; Helmkampf M; Bruchhaus I; Hausdorf B
    BMC Genomics; 2011 Nov; 12():572. PubMed ID: 22111761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences.
    Peterson KJ; Eernisse DJ
    Evol Dev; 2001; 3(3):170-205. PubMed ID: 11440251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Triploblastic relationships with emphasis on the acoelomates and the position of Gnathostomulida, Cycliophora, Plathelminthes, and Chaetognatha: a combined approach of 18S rDNA sequences and morphology.
    Giribet G; Distel DL; Polz M; Sterrer W; Wheeler WC
    Syst Biol; 2000 Sep; 49(3):539-62. PubMed ID: 12116426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modern Data on the Innervation of the Lophophore in Lingula anatina (Brachiopoda) Support the Monophyly of the Lophophorates.
    Temereva EN; Tsitrin EB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123040. PubMed ID: 25901745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phylogenetic relationships of annelids, molluscs, and arthropods evidenced from molecules and morphology.
    Kim CB; Moon SY; Gelder SR; Kim W
    J Mol Evol; 1996 Sep; 43(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 8703086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative lophotrochozoan neurogenesis and larval neuroanatomy: recent advances from previously neglected taxa.
    Wanninger A
    Acta Biol Hung; 2008; 59 Suppl():127-36. PubMed ID: 18652385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phylogeny of protostome worms derived from 18S rRNA sequences.
    Winnepenninckx B; Backeljau T; De Wachter R
    Mol Biol Evol; 1995 Jul; 12(4):641-9. PubMed ID: 7659019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A molecular evolutionary framework for eukaryotic model organisms.
    Sidow A; Thomas WK
    Curr Biol; 1994 Jul; 4(7):596-603. PubMed ID: 7953533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.