These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8664229)

  • 21. Autorefraction as an outcome measure of laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Pesudovs K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1921-8. PubMed ID: 15342056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in Chinese school-aged children: a cross-sectional study.
    Guo R; Shi L; Xu K; Hong D
    Transl Pediatr; 2022 Jun; 11(6):933-946. PubMed ID: 35800271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Accuracy of two autorefractors--Pediatric Autorefractor plusoptiX and Retinomax--in cycloplegic children in comparison to retinoscopy].
    Schmidt-Bacher AE; Kahlert C; Kolling G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2010 Oct; 227(10):792-7. PubMed ID: 20963682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 570 and Canon RK-1 autorefractors: I. Objective autorefraction in normal subjects.
    Raj PS; Villada JR; Lewis AE; Joyce PW; Watson A
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 3)():284-6. PubMed ID: 1446760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction.
    Bennett JR; Stalboerger GM; Hodge DO; Schornack MM
    J Optom; 2015; 8(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25498534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Agreement of subjective and objective refraction measurements following INTRACOR femtosecond laser treatment].
    Fitting A; Ehmer A; Rabsilber TM; Auffarth GU; Holzer MP
    Ophthalmologe; 2011 Sep; 108(9):852-8. PubMed ID: 21720876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical comparison of the Welch Allyn SureSight handheld autorefractor versus cycloplegic autorefraction and retinoscopic refraction.
    Iuorno JD; Grant WD; Noël LP
    J AAPOS; 2004 Apr; 8(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 15088044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Agreement in non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction between a photoscreener and a calibrated autorefractor.
    Kanclerz P; Przewłócka K; Arnold RW
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):130. PubMed ID: 38528448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Agreement of wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction with subjective refraction.
    Bamdad S; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Abdolahian M; Piñero DP
    J Optom; 2022; 15(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 32896507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of a Smartphone-based Autorefractor Compared with Criterion-standard Refraction.
    Jeganathan VSE; Valikodath N; Niziol LM; Hansen S; Apostolou H; Woodward MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Dec; 95(12):1135-1141. PubMed ID: 30451804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparisons of the handheld autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor, and subjective refraction in Singapore adults.
    Farook M; Venkatramani J; Gazzard G; Cheng A; Tan D; Saw SM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 82(12):1066-70. PubMed ID: 16357649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cycloplegic autorefraction versus subjective refraction: the Tehran Eye Study.
    Hashemi H; Khabazkhoob M; Asharlous A; Soroush S; Yekta A; Dadbin N; Fotouhi A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 100(8):1122-7. PubMed ID: 26541436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
    Lebow KA; Campbell CE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laboratory, clinical, and kindergarten test of a new eccentric infrared photorefractor (PowerRefractor).
    Choi M; Weiss S; Schaeffel F; Seidemann A; Howland HC; Wilhelm B; Wilhelm H
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Oct; 77(10):537-48. PubMed ID: 11100892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How accurate is the hand-held refractor Retinomax(R) in measuring cycloplegic refraction: a further evaluation.
    Cordonnier M; Dramaix M; Kallay O; de Bideran M
    Strabismus; 1998 Sep; 6(3):133-142. PubMed ID: 10623951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Excess of autorefraction over subjective refraction: dependence on age.
    Joubert L; Harris WF
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jun; 74(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 9255824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Examination of preschool children for refractive errors. First experience using a handheld autorefractor].
    Büchner TF; Schnorbus U; Grenzebach UH; Stupp T; Busse H
    Ophthalmologe; 2003 Nov; 100(11):971-8. PubMed ID: 14669034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of an open view autorefractor with an open view aberrometer in determining peripheral refraction in children.
    Demir P; Macedo AF; Chakraborty R; Baskaran K
    J Optom; 2023; 16(1):20-29. PubMed ID: 35022155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ametropia detection using a novel, compact wavefront autorefractor.
    Hernández CS; Gil A; Zaytouny A; Casares I; Poderoso J; de Lara A; Wehse A; Dave SR; Lim D; Lage E; Alejandre-Alba N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Mar; 44(2):311-320. PubMed ID: 38084770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of visual acuity measurements after autorefraction vs manual refraction in eyes with and without diabetic macular edema.
    Sun JK; Qin H; Aiello LP; Melia M; Beck RW; Andreoli CM; Edwards PA; Glassman AR; Pavlica MR;
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2012 Apr; 130(4):470-9. PubMed ID: 22159173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.