These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8664540)

  • 1. Inconsistency of evolutionary tree topology reconstruction methods when substitution rates vary across characters.
    Chang JT
    Math Biosci; 1996 Jun; 134(2):189-215. PubMed ID: 8664540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Full reconstruction of Markov models on evolutionary trees: identifiability and consistency.
    Chang JT
    Math Biosci; 1996 Oct; 137(1):51-73. PubMed ID: 8854662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choosing the best ancestral character state reconstruction method.
    Royer-Carenzi M; Pontarotti P; Didier G
    Math Biosci; 2013 Mar; 242(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 23276531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distances that perfectly mislead.
    Huson DH; Steel M
    Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):327-32. PubMed ID: 15205056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A phylogenetic model for investigating correlated evolution of substitution rates and continuous phenotypic characters.
    Lartillot N; Poujol R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Jan; 28(1):729-44. PubMed ID: 20926596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EM for phylogenetic topology reconstruction on nonhomogeneous data.
    Ibáñez-Marcelo E; Casanellas M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2014 Jun; 14():132. PubMed ID: 24938507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The information content of a character under a Markov model of evolution.
    Shpak M; Churchill GA
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Nov; 17(2):231-43. PubMed ID: 11083937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods.
    Yang Z
    J Mol Evol; 1996 Feb; 42(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 8919881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficient biased estimation of evolutionary distances when substitution rates vary across sites.
    Guindon S; Gascuel O
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Apr; 19(4):534-43. PubMed ID: 11919295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative method for both discrete and continuous characters using the threshold model.
    Felsenstein J
    Am Nat; 2012 Feb; 179(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 22218305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Twisted trees and inconsistency of tree estimation when gaps are treated as missing data - The impact of model mis-specification in distance corrections.
    McTavish EJ; Steel M; Holder MT
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Dec; 93():289-95. PubMed ID: 26256643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data.
    Lewis PO
    Syst Biol; 2001; 50(6):913-25. PubMed ID: 12116640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic distance for a general non-stationary markov substitution process.
    Kaehler BD; Yap VB; Zhang R; Huttley GA
    Syst Biol; 2015 Mar; 64(2):281-93. PubMed ID: 25503772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Property and efficiency of the maximum likelihood method for molecular phylogeny.
    Saitou N
    J Mol Evol; 1988; 27(3):261-73. PubMed ID: 3138428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferring ancestral sequences in taxon-rich phylogenies.
    Gascuel O; Steel M
    Math Biosci; 2010 Oct; 227(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 20627110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pitfalls of heterogeneous processes for phylogenetic reconstruction.
    Stefankovic D; Vigoda E
    Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 17366141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
    Sourdis J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 3386530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On inconsistency of the neighbor-joining, least squares, and minimum evolution estimation when substitution processes are incorrectly modeled.
    Susko E; Inagaki Y; Roger AJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Sep; 21(9):1629-42. PubMed ID: 15155796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferring and testing hypotheses of cladistic character dependence by using character compatibility.
    O'Keefe FR; Wagner PJ
    Syst Biol; 2001; 50(5):657-75. PubMed ID: 12116937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.