These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8664634)
21. Hard sell. Yarrow S Nurs Times; 1994 Jun 29-Jul 5; 90(26):52-3. PubMed ID: 8047441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Implementation of international code of marketing breast-milk substitutes in China. Liu A; Dai Y; Xie X; Chen L Breastfeed Med; 2014 Nov; 9(9):467-72. PubMed ID: 25026262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Government regulation of alcohol advertising: protecting industry profits versus promoting the public health. Mosher JF; Wallack LM J Public Health Policy; 1981 Dec; 2(4):333-53. PubMed ID: 7334125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The babymilk question. Charlton H Mod Midwife; 1997 Sep; 7(9):10. PubMed ID: 9370617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Campaigners for breast feeding claim partial victory. Brown P BMJ; 2001 Jan; 322(7280):191. PubMed ID: 11159607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Postnatal care. Time to avoid the clinic? Rajan L Nurs Times; 1985 Aug 7-13; 81(32):24-6. PubMed ID: 3848905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Advertising infant formulas in hospitals. Price C; Jackson K BMJ; 1991 Oct; 303(6809):1058. PubMed ID: 1954464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Health workers and the baby food industry. Anand RK BMJ; 1996 Jun; 312(7046):1556-7. PubMed ID: 8664662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Nothing new in UK's strategy on childhood obesity. Lobstein T; McPherson K Lancet; 2016 Aug; 388(10047):853-4. PubMed ID: 27597454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Midwives' journal. Who needs advertising? Palmer G Nurs Times; 1987 May 20-26; 83(20):61-2. PubMed ID: 3648732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. HVA code of practice for health visitors in relation to the international code of marketing of breastmilk substitutes. Health Visit; 1986 Oct; 59(10):317-8. PubMed ID: 3641805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Baby-food giant breaks promise. Now resumption of boycott against Nestlé]. Forslind E Vardfacket; 1990 May; 14(9):14-5. PubMed ID: 2382494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [It is inconceivable that the Swedish Lactation Code protects industrial breast-milk substitutes]. Almroth S; Sjögren C; Höjer B Lakartidningen; 1992 Apr; 89(15):1275. PubMed ID: 1578993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Infant food marketing strategies undermine effective regulation of breast-milk substitutes: trends in print advertising in Australia, 1950-2010. Smith J; Blake M Aust N Z J Public Health; 2013 Aug; 37(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 23895476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Baby milk companies accused of breaching code. Code is often disregarded in the United Kingdom. Campbell CM BMJ; 1997 Mar; 314(7083):830. PubMed ID: 9081023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Misrepresenting milks: the industry responds. Health Visit; 1993 Sep; 66(9):336-7. PubMed ID: 8244745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Baby food giants accused of wooing mothers in India off breastfeeding. O'Dowd A BMJ; 2013 Aug; 347():f4934. PubMed ID: 23918672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Circumventing the WHO Code? An observational study. Berry NJ; Jones SC; Iverson D Arch Dis Child; 2012 Apr; 97(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 21719442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The WHO code for the marketing of breast-milk substitutes. Birth; 1985; 12(4):243-4. PubMed ID: 3851666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]