These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8665129)

  • 21. Variation of the sensitometric characteristics of seven mammographic films with processing conditions.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Dimakopoulou AD; Koulentianos ED; Serefoglou AN; Yakoumakis EN
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):666-71. PubMed ID: 15326045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimum processing of mammographic film.
    Sprawls P; Kitts EL
    Radiographics; 1996 Mar; 16(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 8966292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using light sensitometry to evaluate mammography film performance.
    West MS; Spelic DC
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):854-60. PubMed ID: 10841387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Latent image fading in mobile mammographic screening.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Dec; 66(792):1204-5. PubMed ID: 8293271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Quality assured images in mammographic screening. Assessment criteria as a basis for national guidelines].
    Ståhl M; Edström C
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Mar; 98(10):1097-101. PubMed ID: 11301976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Quality assurance in organized screening of breast cancer].
    De Landtsheer JP; Delaloye JF; Lepori D; De Grandi P; Levi F
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2003 May; 123(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 15095710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
    Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
    Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality control in mammography.
    Hendrick RE; Botsco M; Plott CM
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1041-57. PubMed ID: 7480654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The technical support of mammography].
    Rozhkova NI; Chikirdin EG; Riudiger IuG; Kochetova GP; Lisachenko IV; Iakobs OE
    Med Tekh; 2000; (5):45-7. PubMed ID: 11076366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
    Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Dimov A; Lichev A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Routine quality control tests for film-screen mammographic systems with automatic exposure control.
    Geise RA; Morin RL; Wasserman NF
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(6):904-8. PubMed ID: 3237149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of results from quality control of physical parameters and results from clinical evaluation of mammographic images for the mammography screening facilities in Poland.
    Fabiszewska E; Grabska I; Jankowska K; Wesolowska E; Bulski W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):206-9. PubMed ID: 21824870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Processor quality assurance using digital imaging.
    Goren AD; Dunn SM; Van der Stelt PF
    N Y State Dent J; 1997 Apr; 63(4):42-7. PubMed ID: 9167431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development and implementation of a quality assurance program for mammography.
    de Paredes ES; Frazier AB; Hartwell GD; Strash AM; Scheer C; Smith DC; Barnette PA; Noel W; Kenneweg D
    Radiology; 1987 Apr; 163(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 3823463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The quality of mammography scrutinized. Ongoing control mass screenings for breast cancer is necessary].
    Andersson I; Rydén S; Karlberg I
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(35):3106-9. PubMed ID: 7658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital mammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 9672974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of poor control of film processors on mammographic image quality.
    Kimme-Smith C; Sun H; Bassett LW; Gold RH
    Radiographics; 1992 Nov; 12(6):1137-46. PubMed ID: 1439016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Breast imaging: a comparison of digital luminescence radiographs displayed on TV-monitor and film-screen mammography.
    Jarlman O; Borg A; Braw M; Kehler M; Lyttkens K; Samuelsson L
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1994; 18(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 7812984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of two mammography film-screen combinations designed for standard-cycle processing.
    McParland BJ
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jan; 72(853):73-5. PubMed ID: 10341692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.