These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8665766)

  • 21. Temporal trends and morbidities of vacuum, forceps, and combined use of both.
    Fong A; Wu E; Pan D; Chung JH; Ogunyemi DA
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1886-91. PubMed ID: 24635372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. "Assisted vaginal birth using the Paily obstetric forceps vs Ventouse - A randomized clinical trial".
    Burande AP; Jayaraj V; Pai AV; Akkarappatty P; Arathi VL; Pradeep M; Paily VP
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Jan; 280():40-47. PubMed ID: 36399919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown KJ; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mode of delivery in nulliparous women and neonatal intracranial injury.
    Werner EF; Janevic TM; Illuzzi J; Funai EF; Savitz DA; Lipkind HS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 118(6):1239-1246. PubMed ID: 22105252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality after attempted operative vaginal delivery at midpelvic station.
    Muraca GM; Sabr Y; Lisonkova S; Skoll A; Brant R; Cundiff GW; Joseph KS
    CMAJ; 2017 Jun; 189(22):E764-E772. PubMed ID: 28584040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Outcome of forceps delivery versus vacuum extraction--a review of 200 cases.
    Achanna S; Monga D
    Singapore Med J; 1994 Dec; 35(6):605-8. PubMed ID: 7761886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study.
    Bahl R; Van de Venne M; Macleod M; Strachan B; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1526-32. PubMed ID: 23924292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Maternal and neonatal trauma following operative vaginal delivery.
    Muraca GM; Boutin A; Razaz N; Lisonkova S; John S; Ting JY; Scott H; Kramer MS; Joseph KS
    CMAJ; 2022 Jan; 194(1):E1-E12. PubMed ID: 35012946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical experience with the Silc Cup Vacuum Extractor.
    Low J; Ng TY; Chew SY
    Singapore Med J; 1993 Apr; 34(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 8266153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
    Caughey AB; Sandberg PL; Zlatnik MG; Thiet MP; Parer JT; Laros RK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):908-12. PubMed ID: 16260505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vacuum-assisted delivery.
    Vacca A
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Feb; 16(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 11866494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Short-term neonatal outcomes of vacuum-assisted delivery. A case-control study].
    Ferraz A; Nunes F; Resende C; Almeida MC; Taborda A
    An Pediatr (Engl Ed); 2019 Dec; 91(6):378-385. PubMed ID: 30981643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Maternal and neonatal immediate effects of sequential delivery.
    Barata S; Cardoso E; Ferreira Santo S; Clode N; Mendes Graça L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Jul; 25(7):981-3. PubMed ID: 21740319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Head injuries after instrumental vaginal deliveries.
    Doumouchtsis SK; Arulkumaran S
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 18(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 16601472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Obstetric correlates of neonatal retinal hemorrhage.
    Williams MC; Knuppel RA; O'Brien WF; Weiss A; Spellacy WN; Pietrantoni M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 May; 81(5 ( Pt 1)):688-94. PubMed ID: 8469455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is the vacuum extractor really the instrument of first choice?
    Chan CC; Malathi I; Yeo GS
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 39(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 10554939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Comparison vacuum extractor versus forceps].
    Schaal JP; Equy V; Hoffman P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Dec; 37 Suppl 8():S231-43. PubMed ID: 19268200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Soft cup vacuum extraction: a comparison of outlet delivery.
    Dell DL; Sightler SE; Plauché WC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 4058820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.