These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 866662)
1. An inaccuracy in computed tomography: the energy dependence of CT values. Zatz LM; Alvarez RE Radiology; 1977 Jul; 124(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 866662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors affecting the use of quantitative information from a CT scanner. McCullough EC Radiology; 1977 Jul; 124(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 866663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The unreliability of CT numbers as absolute values. Levi C; Gray JE; McCullough EC; Hattery RR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Sep; 139(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 6981306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of CT scanners in megavoltage photon-beam therapy planning. Geise RA; McCullough EC Radiology; 1977 Jul; 124(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 405706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The apical artifact: elevated attenuation values toward the apex of the skull. Di Chiro G; Brooks RA; Dubal L; Chew E J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1978 Jan; 2(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 670474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mass estimates by computed tomography: physical density from CT numbers. Mull RT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Nov; 143(5):1101-4. PubMed ID: 6333158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners. Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interphantom and interscanner variations for Hounsfield units--establishment of reference values for HU in a commercial QA phantom. Sande EP; Martinsen AC; Hole EO; Olerud HM Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(17):5123-35. PubMed ID: 20714048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computed tomography with monochromatic x rays. Dilmanian FA Am J Physiol Imaging; 1992; 7(3-4):175-93. PubMed ID: 1343214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The removal of a "cupping" artefact from brain images produced by the EMI 7070 CT scanner. Mott DJ; Zheng GL; Eddleston B Br J Radiol; 1985 Sep; 58(693):873-80. PubMed ID: 3916065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose and image quality evaluation of a dedicated cone-beam CT system for high-contrast neurologic applications. Yu L; Vrieze TJ; Bruesewitz MR; Kofler JM; DeLone DR; Pallanch JF; Lindell EP; McCollough CH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):W193-201. PubMed ID: 20093573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative CT applications: comparison of current scanners. Cann CE Radiology; 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):257-61. PubMed ID: 3786773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between pixel values in a cone-beam computed tomographic scanner and the computed tomographic values in a multidetector row computed tomographic scanner. Chindasombatjaroen J; Kakimoto N; Shimamoto H; Murakami S; Furukawa S J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):662-5. PubMed ID: 21926866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative assessment of the influence of location, internal temperature, idle time, and normalization on the sensitivity of a mobile PET/CT scanner. Belakhlef S; Church C; Hays A; Fraser R; Lakhanpal S J Nucl Med Technol; 2008 Sep; 36(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 18703620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality assurance in CT. Stein KM Radiol Technol; 2000; 72(1):67. PubMed ID: 11019412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Quality control in computed tomography]. Rockstroh G; Lieberenz S; Straubel U Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1989; 30(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 2798824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]