These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 866663)

  • 1. Factors affecting the use of quantitative information from a CT scanner.
    McCullough EC
    Radiology; 1977 Jul; 124(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 866663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An inaccuracy in computed tomography: the energy dependence of CT values.
    Zatz LM; Alvarez RE
    Radiology; 1977 Jul; 124(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 866662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of CT scanners in megavoltage photon-beam therapy planning.
    Geise RA; McCullough EC
    Radiology; 1977 Jul; 124(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 405706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The unreliability of CT numbers as absolute values.
    Levi C; Gray JE; McCullough EC; Hattery RR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Sep; 139(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 6981306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mass estimates by computed tomography: physical density from CT numbers.
    Mull RT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Nov; 143(5):1101-4. PubMed ID: 6333158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Quality control in computed tomography].
    Rockstroh G; Lieberenz S; Straubel U
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1989; 30(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 2798824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new phantom for evaluation of low-contrast detectability of X-ray CT scanner.
    Endo M; Iinuma TA; Takenaka E; Inoue M
    Radiat Med; 1984; 2(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 6543966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dosimetric impact of a CT metal artefact suppression algorithm for proton, electron and photon therapies.
    Wei J; Sandison GA; Hsi WC; Ringor M; Lu X
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5183-97. PubMed ID: 17019032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Methods of quality assurance in computed tomography using test measurements on a CT/T-8800 as an example].
    Nüsslin F
    Rontgenpraxis; 1984 Aug; 37(8):293-6. PubMed ID: 6484754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assurance in CT.
    Stein KM
    Radiol Technol; 2000; 72(1):67. PubMed ID: 11019412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improvement of image quality in megavoltage computed tomography with second generation scanning mode.
    Nakagawa K; Aoki Y; Sasaki Y
    Radiat Oncol Investig; 1997; 5(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 9372549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variations in measured computed tomography number values.
    Faulkner K; Moores BM
    Radiography; 1985; 51(597):163-7. PubMed ID: 4011863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implications of computed tomography for inhomogeneity corrections in photon beam dose calculations.
    Sontag MR; Battista JJ; Bronskill MJ; Cunningham JR
    Radiology; 1977 Jul; 124(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 405707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. X-ray imaging physics for nuclear medicine technologists. Part 1: Basic principles of x-ray production.
    Seibert JA
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2004 Sep; 32(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 15347692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of low-contrast lesions in computed body tomography: an experimental study of simulated lesions.
    Meaney TF; Raudkivi U; McIntyre WJ; Gallagher JH; Haaga JR; Havrilla TR; Reich NE
    Radiology; 1980 Jan; 134(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 7350595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in benign and malignant bone disease.
    Horger M; Bares R
    Semin Nucl Med; 2006 Oct; 36(4):286-94. PubMed ID: 16950146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Truncated-view artifacts: clinical importance on CT.
    Lehr JL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Jul; 141(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 6602518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices.
    Stützel J; Oelfke U; Nill S
    Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 18031854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose and image quality evaluation of a dedicated cone-beam CT system for high-contrast neurologic applications.
    Yu L; Vrieze TJ; Bruesewitz MR; Kofler JM; DeLone DR; Pallanch JF; Lindell EP; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):W193-201. PubMed ID: 20093573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A CT scanning protocol for a quality assurance program.
    Seijo CA
    Radiol Technol; 1981; 52(5):497-509. PubMed ID: 7335865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.