These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8666643)

  • 1. Stiffness measurements to assess healing during leg lengthening. A preliminary report.
    Dwyer JS; Owen PJ; Evans GA; Kuiper JH; Richardson JB
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Mar; 78(2):286-9. PubMed ID: 8666643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone stiffness in children: part II. Objectives criteria for children to assess healing during leg lengthening.
    Chotel F; Braillon P; Sailhan F; Gadeyne S; Gellon JO; Panczer G; Pedrini C; Berard J
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2008; 28(5):538-43. PubMed ID: 18580369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone stiffness in children: part I. In vivo assessment of the stiffness of femur and tibia in children.
    Chotel F; Braillon P; Sailhan F; Gadeyne S; Panczer G; Pedrini C; Berard J
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2008; 28(5):534-7. PubMed ID: 18580368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review of 240 patients undergoing distraction osteogenesis for congenital post-traumatic or postinfective lower limb length discrepancy.
    Maffulli N; Lombari C; Matarazzo L; Nele U; Pagnotta G; Fixsen JA
    J Am Coll Surg; 1996 May; 182(5):394-402. PubMed ID: 8620274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distraction osteogenesis of the femur using conventional monolateral external fixator.
    Sangkaew C
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Sep; 128(9):889-99. PubMed ID: 17874249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the complication rates between first and second (repeated) lengthening in the same limb segment.
    Griffith SI; McCarthy JJ; Davidson RS
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2006; 26(4):534-6. PubMed ID: 16791075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Leg lengthening with a new type of external fixator (a preliminary report on 24 cases).
    Rezaian SM
    Pahlavi Med J; 1976 Apr; 7(2):233-41. PubMed ID: 1272597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fractures after femoral lengthening using the Ilizarov method.
    Danziger MB; Kumar A; DeWeese J
    J Pediatr Orthop; 1995; 15(2):220-3. PubMed ID: 7745098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Callotasis for post-traumatic shortening and deformity of leg.
    Nishimura N; Yamano Y
    Osaka City Med J; 2000 Dec; 46(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 11252733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fractures after Wagner limb lengthening.
    Luke DL; Schoenecker PL; Blair VP; Capelli AM
    J Pediatr Orthop; 1992 Jan; 12(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 1732290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Reduction of the period of treatment for leg lengthening. Technique and advantages].
    Shevtsov V; Popkov A; Popkov D; Prévot J
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 May; 87(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 11351224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry predicts bone formation in lower limb callotasis lengthening.
    Maffulli N; Cheng JC; Sher A; Lam TP
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1997 Jul; 79(4):250-6. PubMed ID: 9244066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Good results but many complications in unilateral leg lengthening techniques].
    van Cappelle HG; Visser JD
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Jul; 139(30):1542-6. PubMed ID: 7675131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Femoral lengthening by callotasis. A study of a series of 79 cases in children and adolescents].
    Glorion C; Pouliquen JC; Langlais J; Ceolin JL; Kassis B
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1995; 81(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 7569190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complications of limb lengthening. A learning curve.
    Dahl MT; Gulli B; Berg T
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Apr; (301):10-8. PubMed ID: 8156659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term results of lower limb lengthening by physeal distraction.
    Zarzycki D; Tesiorowski M; Zarzycka M; Kacki W; Jasiewicz B
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2002; 22(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 11961457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Results of periodic measurement of distractive forces during lengthening of 11 legs by long-term distraction].
    Janovec M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 1979 Aug; 46(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 517032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Extemporaneous lengthening of the femur in children and adolescents. Study of 25 cases].
    Allioux JJ; Rigault P; Padovani JP; Finidori G; Touzet P; Mallet JF
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1988; 74(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 3175108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Biomechanical study on bone healing in experimental limb lengthening].
    Hu J; Zheng XZ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Apr; 32(4):249-51. PubMed ID: 7842933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tissue response during monofocal and bifocal leg lengthening in patients.
    Aarnes GT; Steen H; Kristiansen LP; Ludvigsen P; Reikerås O
    J Orthop Res; 2002 Jan; 20(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 11853080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.