These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8666962)
1. Is there feature-based attentional selection in visual search? Shih SI; Sperling G J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Jun; 22(3):758-79. PubMed ID: 8666962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attentional selection of objects or features: evidence from a modified search task. Mounts JR; Melara RD Percept Psychophys; 1999 Feb; 61(2):322-41. PubMed ID: 10089764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: an attentional blink study. Jiang Y; Chun MM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):664-79. PubMed ID: 11424653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporal attentional capture: effects of irrelevant singletons on rapid serial visual search. Dalton P; Lavie N Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):881-5. PubMed ID: 17328389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feature-based attentional modulation increases with stimulus separation in divided-attention tasks. Sally SL; Vidnyánsky Z; Papathomas TV Spat Vis; 2009; 22(6):529-53. PubMed ID: 19891852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intertrial repetition facilitates selection in time: common mechanisms underlie spatial and temporal search. Yashar A; Lamy D Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):243-51. PubMed ID: 20424053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds. Mounts JR Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1485-93. PubMed ID: 11143458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Heterogeneity effects in visual search predicted from the group scanning model. Macquistan AD Can J Exp Psychol; 1994 Dec; 48(4):495-515. PubMed ID: 7866391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search. Carrasco M; Yeshurun Y J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Apr; 24(2):673-92. PubMed ID: 9554103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Second-order parallel processing: visual search for the odd item in a subset. Friedman-Hill S; Wolfe JM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):531-51. PubMed ID: 7790832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surveying a blank field with the attentional spotlight. Mendez MF Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Oct; 97(2):560-8. PubMed ID: 14620245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Precuing benefits for color and location in a visual search task. Vierck E; Miller J Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):365-73. PubMed ID: 18372756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention? Remington RW; Folk CL; McLean JP Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):298-307. PubMed ID: 11281104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reaction time drifts identify objects of attention in pigeon visual search. Blough DS J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1993 Apr; 19(2):107-20. PubMed ID: 8505592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception. Johnston JC; Pashler H J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):843-56. PubMed ID: 2148596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of attention in different visual-search tasks. Bravo MJ; Nakayama K Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):465-72. PubMed ID: 1594436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attending to an object's color entails attending to its location: support for location-special views of visual attention. Tsal Y; Lamy D Percept Psychophys; 2000 Jul; 62(5):960-8. PubMed ID: 10997042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]