These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8666963)
1. Spatial precues affect target discrimination in the absence of visual noise. Henderson JM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Jun; 22(3):780-7. PubMed ID: 8666963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is rapid performance improvement across short precue-target delays due to masking from peripheral precues? Chastain G Acta Psychol (Amst); 1992 Mar; 79(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 1598841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Large and rapid improvement in form discrimination accuracy following a location precue. Lyon DR Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Feb; 73(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 2316388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Precuing benefits for color and location in a visual search task. Vierck E; Miller J Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):365-73. PubMed ID: 18372756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of distractors and spatial precues on covert visual search in macaque. Lee BT; McPeek RM Vision Res; 2013 Jan; 76():43-9. PubMed ID: 23099048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of static-noise and grating masks on detection and identification of grating targets. Thomas JP J Opt Soc Am A; 1985 Sep; 2(9):1586-92. PubMed ID: 4045589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Allocation of visual attention depends on type of precue. Cheal M Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2001 Nov; 127(4):409-57. PubMed ID: 11942650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Interaction effects in the lateral visual field: an extension of Bouma's (1970) approach]. Heller D; Huckauf A; Nazir T Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(3):386-418. PubMed ID: 8640479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The functional role of attention for spatial coding in the Simon effect. Stoffer TH; Yakin AR Psychol Res; 1994; 56(3):151-62. PubMed ID: 8008777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The spatial distribution of attention following an exogenous cue. Henderson JM; Macquistan AD Percept Psychophys; 1993 Feb; 53(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 8433920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Local and global factors in visual occlusion. Boselie F Perception; 1994; 23(5):517-28. PubMed ID: 7800467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception. Johnston JC; Pashler H J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):843-56. PubMed ID: 2148596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combining image degradations in a recognition task. Uttal WR; Baruch T; Allen L Percept Psychophys; 1995 Jul; 57(5):682-91. PubMed ID: 7644328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Local and global minima in visual completion: effects of symmetry and orientation. Sekuler AB Perception; 1994; 23(5):529-45. PubMed ID: 7800468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of spatial attention on invisible stimuli. Shin K; Stolte M; Chong SC Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1507-13. PubMed ID: 19801611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How much like a target can a mask be? Geometric, spatial, and temporal similarity in priming: a reply to Schlaghecken and Eimer (2006). Lleras A; Enns JT J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):495-500. PubMed ID: 16846278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]