These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8667154)

  • 1. Use of occlusive dressings on central venous catheter sites in hospitalized children.
    Taylor D; Myers ST; Monarch K; Leon C; Hall J; Sibley Y
    J Pediatr Nurs; 1996 Jun; 11(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 8667154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of central venous catheter dressings in bone marrow transplant recipients.
    Brandt B; DePalma J; Irwin M; Shogan J; Lucke JF
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1996 Jun; 23(5):829-36. PubMed ID: 8792352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of dressing materials on central venous catheter infection rates.
    Treston-Aurand J; Olmsted RN; Allen-Bridson K; Craig CP
    J Intraven Nurs; 1997; 20(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 9281961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved long-term maintenance of central venous catheters with a new dressing technique.
    Eisenberg PG; Howard MP; Gianino MS
    J Intraven Nurs; 1990; 13(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 2401932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Once- versus twice-weekly changing of central venous catheter occlusive dressing in intensive chemotherapy patients: results of a randomized multicenter study.
    Vokurka S; Bystricka E; Visokaiova M; Scudlova J
    Med Sci Monit; 2009 Mar; 15(3):CR107-10. PubMed ID: 19247240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Central line dressings: study of infection rates.
    Lucas H; Attard-Montalto S
    Paediatr Nurs; 1996 Jul; 8(6):21-3. PubMed ID: 8718254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Frequency of change of dressings. 2 comparative trials with central venous catheters in children, hospitalized for severe chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation].
    Fessard E
    Soins; 1994; (585-586):33-8. PubMed ID: 7939877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a new hydrocolloid occlusive dressing for central catheters used in total parenteral nutrition.
    Haffejee AA; Moodley J; Pillay K; Singh B; Thomson S; Bhamjee A
    S Afr J Surg; 1991 Dec; 29(4):142-6. PubMed ID: 1763392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating central venous catheter care in a pediatric intensive care unit.
    Hatler C; Buckwald L; Salas-Allison Z; Murphy-Taylor C
    Am J Crit Care; 2009 Nov; 18(6):514-20; quiz 521. PubMed ID: 19880953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections in children with cancer.
    Horvath B; Norville R; Lee D; Hyde A; Gregurich M; Hockenberry M
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2009 Mar; 36(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 19273413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Avoiding an unnecessary outcome. A comparative trial between IV3000 and a conventional film dressing to assess rates of catheter-related sepsis.
    Keenlyside D
    Prof Nurse; 1993 Feb; 8(5):288-91. PubMed ID: 8451247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transparent and gauze dressings and their effect on infection rates of central venous catheters: a review of past and current literature.
    Lau CE
    J Intraven Nurs; 1996; 19(5):240-5. PubMed ID: 9060348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Central venous catheter infections in burn patients with scheduled catheter exchange and replacement.
    O'Mara MS; Reed NL; Palmieri TL; Greenhalgh DG
    J Surg Res; 2007 Oct; 142(2):341-50. PubMed ID: 17631903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of transparent adherent and dry sterile gauze dressings for long-term central catheters in patients undergoing bone marrow transplant.
    Shivnan JC; McGuire D; Freedman S; Sharkazy E; Bosserman G; Larson E; Grouleff P
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1991; 18(8):1349-56. PubMed ID: 1762975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [New therapeutic strategies for the treatment of difficult wounds].
    Onesti MG; Bitonti A; Fino P; Ciotti M; Scuderi N
    G Chir; 2008 May; 29(5):212-20. PubMed ID: 18507956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do dressings with increased permeability reduce the incidence of central venous catheter related sepsis?
    Reynolds MG; Tebbs SE; Elliott TS
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 1997 Feb; 13(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 9095879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of bacterial growth with occlusive dressing use on excoriated skin in the premature infant.
    Strickland ME
    Neonatal Netw; 1997 Mar; 16(2):29-35. PubMed ID: 9087009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two different time interval protocols for central venous catheter dressing in bone marrow transplant patients: results of a randomized, multicenter study. The Italian Nurse Bone Marrow Transplant Group (GITMO).
    Laura R; Degl'Innocenti M; Mocali M; Alberani F; Boschi S; Giraudi A; Arnaud MT; Zucchinali R; Paris MG; Dallara R; Thaler S; Perobelli G; Parfazi S; De Lazzer T; Peron G
    Haematologica; 2000 Mar; 85(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 10702816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors of hemodialysis central venous catheter exit-site infections.
    Harwood L; Wilson B; Thompson B; Brown E; Young D
    CANNT J; 2008; 18(2):26-35. PubMed ID: 18669009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of central venous catheter type and methods on catheter-related colonization and bacteraemia.
    Moretti EW; Ofstead CL; Kristy RM; Wetzler HP
    J Hosp Infect; 2005 Oct; 61(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 16026898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.