These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8667162)

  • 21. The influence of relationship status, mate seeking, and sex on intrasexual competition.
    Fisher ML; Tran US; Voracek M
    J Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 148(4):493-508. PubMed ID: 18807423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relationship dealbreakers: traits people avoid in potential mates.
    Jonason PK; Garcia JR; Webster GD; Li NP; Fisher HE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Dec; 41(12):1697-711. PubMed ID: 26445853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mate value asymmetry and relationship satisfaction in female opinion.
    Nowak N; Danel D
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2014; 40(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 23898967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The long and short of mistress relationships: Sex-differentiated mate preferences reflect a compromise of mating ideals.
    Choy BKC; Li NP; Tan K
    J Pers; 2023 Apr; 91(2):383-399. PubMed ID: 35567542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Research Note on the Influence of Relationship Length and Sex on Preferences for Altruistic and Cooperative Mates.
    Bhogal MS; Galbraith N; Manktelow K
    Psychol Rep; 2019 Apr; 122(2):550-557. PubMed ID: 29618294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sex differences in perceived controllability of mate value: an evolutionary perspective.
    Ben Hamida S; Mineka S; Bailey JM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1998 Oct; 75(4):953-66. PubMed ID: 9825529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Adaptive mating strategies and the problem of mate retention.
    Husárová B
    Anthropol Anz; 2005 Sep; 63(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16176054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Role of Sexual and Romantic Attraction in Human Mate Preferences.
    Scheller M; de Sousa AA; Brotto LA; Little AC
    J Sex Res; 2024 Feb; 61(2):299-312. PubMed ID: 36795115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perceived consequences of hypothetical identity-inconsistent sexual experiences: effects of perceiver's sex and sexual identity.
    Preciado MA; Johnson KL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Apr; 43(3):505-18. PubMed ID: 23733152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management.
    Rudman LA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1998 Mar; 74(3):629-45. PubMed ID: 9523410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Norwegian Men and Women Value Similar Mate Traits in Short-Term Relationships.
    Mehmetoglu M; Määttänen I
    Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(4):1474704920979623. PubMed ID: 33371743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why.
    Li NP; Kenrick DT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Mar; 90(3):468-89. PubMed ID: 16594832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Going along versus going alone: when fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity.
    Griskevicius V; Goldstein NJ; Mortensen CR; Cialdini RB; Kenrick DT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Aug; 91(2):281-94. PubMed ID: 16881765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Knowing your own mate value: sex-specific personality effects on the accuracy of expected mate choices.
    Back MD; Penke L; Schmukle SC; Asendorpf JB
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Aug; 22(8):984-9. PubMed ID: 21724949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a New Mating Effort Questionnaire.
    Albert G; Richardson GB; Arnocky S; Senveli Z; Hodges-Simeon CR
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):511-530. PubMed ID: 32839933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The rival wears Prada: luxury consumption as a female competition strategy.
    Hudders L; De Backer C; Fisher M; Vyncke P
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Jun; 12(3):570-87. PubMed ID: 25299993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Romantic love: a mammalian brain system for mate choice.
    Fisher HE; Aron A; Brown LL
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2006 Dec; 361(1476):2173-86. PubMed ID: 17118931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dependents as Signals of Mate Value: Long-term Mating Strategy Predicts Displays on Online Dating Profiles for Men.
    Zinck MJ; Weir LK; Fisher ML
    Evol Psychol Sci; 2022; 8(2):174-188. PubMed ID: 34660178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Family Matters: Rethinking the Psychology of Human Social Motivation.
    Ko A; Pick CM; Kwon JY; Barlev M; Krems JA; Varnum MEW; Neel R; Peysha M; Boonyasiriwat W; Brandstätter E; Crispim AC; Cruz JE; David D; David OA; de Felipe RP; Fetvadjiev VH; Fischer R; Galdi S; Galindo O; Golovina G; Gomez-Jacinto L; Graf S; Grossmann I; Gul P; Hamamura T; Han S; Hitokoto H; Hřebíčková M; Johnson JL; Karl JA; Malanchuk O; Murata A; Na J; O J; Rizwan M; Roth E; Salgado SAS; Samoylenko E; Savchenko T; Sevincer AT; Stanciu A; Suh EM; Talhelm T; Uskul AK; Uz I; Zambrano D; Kenrick DT
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Jan; 15(1):173-201. PubMed ID: 31791196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Finding the Mating Gear: The Development and Validation of a Mate Access Scale.
    Walldén C; Westerlund M; Gunst A; Santtila P; Antfolk J
    Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(3):1474704920935583. PubMed ID: 32633132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.