These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8667536)
1. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Ernster V JAMA; 1996 Jul; 276(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 8667536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation. Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Ernster V JAMA; 1996 Jul; 276(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 8667537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer. Kerlikowske K; Barclay J; Grady D; Sickles EA; Ernster V J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Jan; 89(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 8978410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. Buist DS; Porter PL; Lehman C; Taplin SH; White E J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(19):1432-40. PubMed ID: 15467032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer. Kerlikowske K; Carney PA; Geller B; Mandelson MT; Taplin SH; Malvin K; Ernster V; Urban N; Cutter G; Rosenberg R; Ballard-Barbash R Ann Intern Med; 2000 Dec; 133(11):855-63. PubMed ID: 11103055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. Kerlikowske K; Ichikawa L; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Vacek PM; Smith-Bindman R; Yankaskas B; Carney PA; Ballard-Barbash R; J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):386-95. PubMed ID: 17341730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up. Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Carney PA; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Kerlikowske K; Rosenberg R; Rutter CM; Geller BM; Abraham LA; Taplin SH; Dignan M; Cutter G; Ballard-Barbash R Ann Intern Med; 2003 Feb; 138(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12558355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Rosenberg RD; Hunt WC; Williamson MR; Gilliland FD; Wiest PW; Kelsey CA; Key CR; Linver MN Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):511-8. PubMed ID: 9807581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Varying levels of family history of breast cancer in relation to mammographic breast density (United States). Crest AB; Aiello EJ; Anderson ML; Buist DS Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Aug; 17(6):843-50. PubMed ID: 16783612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening. Checka CM; Chun JE; Schnabel FR; Lee J; Toth H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):W292-5. PubMed ID: 22358028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old. Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program. Oestreicher N; Lehman CD; Seger DJ; Buist DS; White E AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):428-32. PubMed ID: 15671358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors. Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Wray LA; Helvie MA Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 14695385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study. Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Tosteson AN; Sprague BL; Tice JA; Lehman CD; Miglioretti DL; Ann Intern Med; 2015 May; 162(10):673-81. PubMed ID: 25984843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening. Chau SL; Alabaster A; Luikart K; Brenman LM; Habel LA J Prim Care Community Health; 2017 Apr; 8(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 27799412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of modern screening mammography. Kerlikowske K; Barclay J J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):105-11. PubMed ID: 9709285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is mammography adequate for screening women with inherited BRCA mutations and low breast density? Bigenwald RZ; Warner E; Gunasekara A; Hill KA; Causer PA; Messner SJ; Eisen A; Plewes DB; Narod SA; Zhang L; Yaffe MJ Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Mar; 17(3):706-11. PubMed ID: 18349291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]