These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8667537)
1. Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation. Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Ernster V JAMA; 1996 Jul; 276(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 8667537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Ernster V JAMA; 1996 Jul; 276(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 8667536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer. Kerlikowske K; Barclay J; Grady D; Sickles EA; Ernster V J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Jan; 89(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 8978410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer. Kerlikowske K; Carney PA; Geller B; Mandelson MT; Taplin SH; Malvin K; Ernster V; Urban N; Cutter G; Rosenberg R; Ballard-Barbash R Ann Intern Med; 2000 Dec; 133(11):855-63. PubMed ID: 11103055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women. May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Frankel SD; Ominsky SH; Sickles EA; Ernster V J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Dec; 90(23):1801-9. PubMed ID: 9839520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammographic breast density and the Gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population. Tice JA; Cummings SR; Ziv E; Kerlikowske K Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Nov; 94(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 16261410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography. Laya MB; Larson EB; Taplin SH; White E J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 May; 88(10):643-9. PubMed ID: 8627640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Positive predictive value of specific mammographic findings according to reader and patient variables. Venkatesan A; Chu P; Kerlikowske K; Sickles EA; Smith-Bindman R Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):648-57. PubMed ID: 19164116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up. Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Abraham LA; Lehman CD; Yankaskas BC; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Voeks JH; Geller BM; Carney PA; Sickles EA Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):684-92. PubMed ID: 15734926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating organized breast cancer screening implementation: the prevention of late-stage disease? Taplin SH; Ichikawa L; Buist DS; Seger D; White E Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Feb; 13(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 14973097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of modern screening mammography. Kerlikowske K; Barclay J J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):105-11. PubMed ID: 9709285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. Kerlikowske K; Ichikawa L; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Vacek PM; Smith-Bindman R; Yankaskas B; Carney PA; Ballard-Barbash R; J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):386-95. PubMed ID: 17341730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Early results of breast cancer screening research]. Nowicki A; Stogowska I Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors associated with imaging and procedural events used to detect breast cancer after screening mammography. Carney PA; Abraham LA; Miglioretti DL; Yabroff KR; Sickles EA; Buist DS; Kasales CJ; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Dignan MB; Weaver DL; Kerlikowske K; AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 17242246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy. Smith-Bindman R; Chu P; Miglioretti DL; Quale C; Rosenberg RD; Cutter G; Geller B; Bacchetti P; Sickles EA; Kerlikowske K J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 15741572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old. Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan. Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]