These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8667976)

  • 1. Distortion generated by the ear: its emergence and evolution during development.
    Tubach M; McGee J; Walsh EJ
    Laryngoscope; 1996 Jul; 106(7):822-30. PubMed ID: 8667976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations.
    Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1980 Jun; 2(3-4):297-317. PubMed ID: 7410234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonlinear phenomena as observed in the ear canal and at the auditory nerve.
    Fahey PF; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Feb; 77(2):599-612. PubMed ID: 3973231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.
    Siegel JH; Kim DO; Molnar CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1982 Feb; 47(2):303-28. PubMed ID: 7062102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear nonlinearities inferred from two-tone distortion products in the ear canal of the alligator lizard.
    Rosowski JJ; Peake WT; White JR
    Hear Res; 1984 Feb; 13(2):141-58. PubMed ID: 6715262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tuning curves of the difference tone auditory nerve neurophonic.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):160-7. PubMed ID: 8970824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phase effects in forward masking of the compound action potential: a comparison of responses to stimulus and distortion frequencies.
    McAnally KI; Calford MB
    Hear Res; 1995 Nov; 91(1-2):110-8. PubMed ID: 8647713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic modulation of electrically evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissions in gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T
    Neurosci Lett; 1996 Apr; 207(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 8728476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Responses of peripheral auditory neurons to two-tone stimuli during development: III. Rate facilitation.
    Fitzakerley JL; McGee JA; Walsh EJ
    Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 77(1-2):162-7. PubMed ID: 7928727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in the 2f1-f2 acoustic emission and whole-nerve response following sound exposure: long-term effects.
    Dolan TG; Abbas PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Apr; 77(4):1475-83. PubMed ID: 3989103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrically evoked cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T; Nuttall AL; Miller JM
    Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 102(1-2):43-50. PubMed ID: 8951449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coherence of frequency modulation is encoded by cochlear-generated distortion.
    McAnally KI; Calford MB
    Hear Res; 1992 Mar; 58(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 1568943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability.
    Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK; Probst R; Coats AC
    Hear Res; 1987; 28(2-3):173-89. PubMed ID: 3654388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (f2 - f1) and (2f1 - f2).
    Gibian GL; Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1982 Jan; 6(1):35-59. PubMed ID: 7054135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short-term effects of sound exposure on the 2f1-f2 acoustic emission.
    Dolan TG; Abbas PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Apr; 77(4):1614-6. PubMed ID: 3989113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The acoustic two-tone distortions 2f1-f2 and f2-f1 and their possible relation to changes in the operating point of the cochlear amplifier.
    Frank G; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):104-15. PubMed ID: 8880185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea.
    Cooper NP; Rhode WS
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jul; 78(1):261-70. PubMed ID: 9242278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.