BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8668099)

  • 1. Imaging characteristics of x-ray capillary optics in digital mammography.
    Kruger DG; Abreu CC; Hendee EG; Kocharian A; Peppler WW; Mistretta CA; MacDonald CA
    Med Phys; 1996 Feb; 23(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 8668099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multitapered x-ray capillary optics for mammography.
    Bradford CD; Peppler WW; Ross RE
    Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1097-108. PubMed ID: 12094979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurements of capillary x-ray optics with potential for use in mammographic imaging.
    Abreu CC; Kruger DG; MacDonald CA; Mistretta CA; Peppler WW; Xiao QF
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1793-801. PubMed ID: 8587534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. X-ray optics for better diagnostic imaging.
    MacDonald CA; Gibson WM; Peppler WW
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2002 Apr; 1(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 12622517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scattered radiation in scanning slot mammography.
    Jing Z; Huda W; Walker JK
    Med Phys; 1998 Jul; 25(7 Pt 1):1111-7. PubMed ID: 9682196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beam collimation with polycapillary x-ray optics for high contrast high resolution monochromatic imaging.
    Sugiro FR; Li D; MacDonald CA
    Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3288-97. PubMed ID: 15651611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections.
    Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3395-408. PubMed ID: 16372415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from physical measurements.
    Leon SM; Brateman LF; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061901. PubMed ID: 24877812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
    Honda C; Ohara H
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved image quality in digital mammography with image processing.
    Baydush AH; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1503-8. PubMed ID: 10947253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
    Chen X; Nishikawa RM; Chan ST; Lau BA; Zhang L; Mou X
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scanned-projection digital mammography.
    Nishikawa RM; Mawdsley GE; Fenster A; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(5):717-27. PubMed ID: 3683300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
    Higashida Y; Hatemura M; Yoshida A; Takada T; Takahashi M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Usefulness of a small-field digital mammographic imaging system using parabolic polycapillary optics as a diagnostic imaging tool: a preliminary study.
    Chon KS; Park JG; Son HH; Kang SH; Park SH; Kim HW; Kim HS; Yoon KH
    Korean J Radiol; 2009; 10(6):604-12. PubMed ID: 19885317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography.
    Williams MB; Simoni PU; Smilowitz L; Stanton M; Phillips W; Stewart A
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2273-85. PubMed ID: 10587208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system.
    Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Workman A; Yip M; Wells K; Young KC
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2721-34. PubMed ID: 22559643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image quality in mammography with special reference to anti-scatter grids and the magnification technique.
    Nielsen B; Fagerberg G
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1986; 27(4):467-79. PubMed ID: 3776678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Considerations regarding the application of capillary optics to medical radiography.
    Wang Y; Mistretta CA; Shefer RE; Manning HL
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(3):533-44. PubMed ID: 1508087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.