These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8668099)

  • 1. Imaging characteristics of x-ray capillary optics in digital mammography.
    Kruger DG; Abreu CC; Hendee EG; Kocharian A; Peppler WW; Mistretta CA; MacDonald CA
    Med Phys; 1996 Feb; 23(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 8668099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multitapered x-ray capillary optics for mammography.
    Bradford CD; Peppler WW; Ross RE
    Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1097-108. PubMed ID: 12094979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurements of capillary x-ray optics with potential for use in mammographic imaging.
    Abreu CC; Kruger DG; MacDonald CA; Mistretta CA; Peppler WW; Xiao QF
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1793-801. PubMed ID: 8587534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. X-ray optics for better diagnostic imaging.
    MacDonald CA; Gibson WM; Peppler WW
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2002 Apr; 1(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 12622517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scattered radiation in scanning slot mammography.
    Jing Z; Huda W; Walker JK
    Med Phys; 1998 Jul; 25(7 Pt 1):1111-7. PubMed ID: 9682196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beam collimation with polycapillary x-ray optics for high contrast high resolution monochromatic imaging.
    Sugiro FR; Li D; MacDonald CA
    Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3288-97. PubMed ID: 15651611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections.
    Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3395-408. PubMed ID: 16372415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from physical measurements.
    Leon SM; Brateman LF; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061901. PubMed ID: 24877812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
    Honda C; Ohara H
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved image quality in digital mammography with image processing.
    Baydush AH; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1503-8. PubMed ID: 10947253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
    Chen X; Nishikawa RM; Chan ST; Lau BA; Zhang L; Mou X
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scanned-projection digital mammography.
    Nishikawa RM; Mawdsley GE; Fenster A; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(5):717-27. PubMed ID: 3683300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
    Higashida Y; Hatemura M; Yoshida A; Takada T; Takahashi M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Usefulness of a small-field digital mammographic imaging system using parabolic polycapillary optics as a diagnostic imaging tool: a preliminary study.
    Chon KS; Park JG; Son HH; Kang SH; Park SH; Kim HW; Kim HS; Yoon KH
    Korean J Radiol; 2009; 10(6):604-12. PubMed ID: 19885317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography.
    Williams MB; Simoni PU; Smilowitz L; Stanton M; Phillips W; Stewart A
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2273-85. PubMed ID: 10587208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system.
    Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Workman A; Yip M; Wells K; Young KC
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2721-34. PubMed ID: 22559643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image quality in mammography with special reference to anti-scatter grids and the magnification technique.
    Nielsen B; Fagerberg G
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1986; 27(4):467-79. PubMed ID: 3776678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Considerations regarding the application of capillary optics to medical radiography.
    Wang Y; Mistretta CA; Shefer RE; Manning HL
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(3):533-44. PubMed ID: 1508087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.