These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8668433)

  • 1. Reexamining the Snodgrass and Corwin 1988 picture identification norms.
    Koch C; Abbey L; Schmidt S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Dec; 81(3 Pt 1):763-9. PubMed ID: 8668433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual identification thresholds for 150 fragmented pictures from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart picture set.
    Snodgrass JG; Corwin J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Aug; 67(1):3-36. PubMed ID: 3211683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Snodgrass and Vanderwart set revisited: norms for object manipulability and for pictorial ambiguity of objects, chimeric objects, and nonobjects.
    Magnié MN; Besson M; Poncet M; Dolisi C
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Jun; 25(4):521-60. PubMed ID: 12911106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Picture recognition without picture identification: a method for assessing the role of perceptual information in familiarity-based picture recognition.
    Langley MM; Cleary AM; Kostic BN; Woods JA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 17434434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An enquiry into the process of categorization of pictures and words.
    Viswanathan M; Childers TL
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):267-87. PubMed ID: 12705535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of context on discrimination and bias in recognition memory for pictures and words.
    Feenan K; Snodgrass JG
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Sep; 18(5):515-27. PubMed ID: 2233264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Do dissociations between implicit and explicit memory disappear, when reliability of the tests is comparable? An example].
    Meier B
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 11486638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual recognition: as soon as you know it is there, you know what it is.
    Grill-Spector K; Kanwisher N
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Feb; 16(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 15686582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Episodic effects on picture identification for alcoholic Korsakoff patients.
    Cermak LS; Verfaellie M; Letourneau L; Jacoby LL
    Brain Cogn; 1993 May; 22(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 8499114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The picture superiority effect: support for the distinctiveness model.
    Mintzer MZ; Snodgrass JG
    Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(1):113-46. PubMed ID: 10696280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulation of induced gamma band responses in a perceptual learning task in the human EEG.
    Gruber T; Müller MM; Keil A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Jul; 14(5):732-44. PubMed ID: 12167258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selective attention affects implicit and explicit memory for familiar pictures at different delay conditions.
    Ballesteros S; Reales JM; García E; Carrasco M
    Psicothema; 2006 Feb; 18(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 17296015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The picture superiority effect in categorization: visual or semantic?
    Job R; Rumiati R; Lotto L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Sep; 18(5):1019-28. PubMed ID: 1402707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The time course of object-feature retrieval in recognition.
    Lamberts K; Kent C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 18444765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Name-picture verification as a control measure for object naming: a task analysis and norms for a large set of pictures.
    Stadthagen-Gonzalez H; Damian MF; Pérez MA; Bowers JS; Marín J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1581-97. PubMed ID: 19123116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is the picture bizarreness effect a generation effect?
    Marchal A; Nicolas S
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Aug; 87(1):331-40. PubMed ID: 11026434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of report order, identification method, and stimulus characteristics on multidimensional stimulus identification.
    Shieh KK; Lai CJ; Ellingstad VS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Feb; 82(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 8668508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Color- and picture-word Stroop tests: performance changes in old age.
    Graf P; Uttl B; Tuokko H
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 May; 17(3):390-415. PubMed ID: 7650102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does the generation effect occur for pictures?
    Kinjo H; Snodgrass JG
    Am J Psychol; 2000; 113(1):95-121. PubMed ID: 10742845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Holistic processing is not correlated with face-identification accuracy.
    Konar Y; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jan; 21(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 20424020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.