These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8668437)

  • 21. EEG reveals the effect of fMRI scanner noise on noise-sensitive subjects.
    Pripfl J; Robinson S; Leodolter U; Moser E; Bauer H
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):332-41. PubMed ID: 16414278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The windowed sound therapy: a new empirical approach for an effectiv personalized treatment of tinnitus.
    Lugli M; Romani R; Ponzi S; Bacciu S; Parmigiani S
    Int Tinnitus J; 2009; 15(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 19842347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Effect of noise on human mental rotation performance].
    Han L; Wu X; Li X; Hu W; Wang T; Li X
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 1998 Aug; 11(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 11543244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Loudness functions with air and bone conduction stimulation in normal-hearing subjects using a categorical loudness scaling procedure.
    Stenfelt S; Zeitooni M
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():85-92. PubMed ID: 23562775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hearing loss from interrupted, intermittent, and time varying non-Gaussian noise exposure: The applicability of the equal energy hypothesis.
    Hamernik RP; Qiu W; Davis B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2245-54. PubMed ID: 17902860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Selective listening of concurrent auditory stimuli: an event-related potential study.
    Rao A; Zhang Y; Miller S
    Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):123-32. PubMed ID: 20595021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attention-related modulation of auditory brainstem responses during contralateral noise exposure.
    Ikeda K; Sekiguchi T; Hayashi A
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(16):1593-9. PubMed ID: 18806689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neonatal incubators: a toxic sound environment for the preterm infant?*.
    Marik PE; Fuller C; Levitov A; Moll E
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2012 Nov; 13(6):685-9. PubMed ID: 22791088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Acoustical and perceptual assessment of water sounds and their use over road traffic noise.
    Galbrun L; Ali TT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 23297897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On the perception of speech in primary school classrooms: ranking of noise interference and of age influence.
    Prodi N; Visentin C; Feletti A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):255-68. PubMed ID: 23297900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Noise and attention span.
    O'Malley JJ; Gallas J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Jun; 44(3 Pt 1):919-22. PubMed ID: 876803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of noise on a simple visual attentional task.
    Britton LA; Delay ER
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Jun; 68(3 Pt 1):875-8. PubMed ID: 2748304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hearing in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians.
    Schmuziger N; Patscheke J; Probst R
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 16825883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Characteristics of noise exposure during solitary trumpet playing: immediate impact on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and long-term implications for hearing.
    Poissant SF; Freyman RL; MacDonald AJ; Nunes HA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):543-53. PubMed ID: 22531575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is it necessary to penalize impulsive noise +5 dB due to higher risk of hearing damage?
    de Toro MA; Ordoñez R; Reuter K; Hammershøi D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3808-17. PubMed ID: 21682404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of low-frequency random noises on performance of a numeric monitoring task.
    Benignus VA; Otto DA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Feb; 40(1):231-9. PubMed ID: 235116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relation between annoyance and single-number quantities for rating heavy-weight floor impact sound insulation in wooden houses.
    Ryu J; Sato H; Kurakata K; Hiramitsu A; Tanaka M; Hirota T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3047-55. PubMed ID: 21568408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Localization of brief sounds: effects of level and background noise.
    Macpherson EA; Middlebrooks JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Oct; 108(4):1834-49. PubMed ID: 11051510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.