These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8668439)
1. Annoyance and discomfort during exposure to high-frequency noise from an ultrasonic washer. Holmberg K; Landström U; Nordström B Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Dec; 81(3 Pt 1):819-27. PubMed ID: 8668439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of annoyance from low frequency noise under laboratory conditions. Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska M; Dudarewicz A; Szymczak W; Sliwinska-Kowalska M Noise Health; 2010; 12(48):166-81. PubMed ID: 20603573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Annoyance and loudness measurements in auditory fatigue and recovery under different sound exposures]. Donner R; Doppler U; Haider M; Hloch T; Koller M Soz Praventivmed; 1980 Jun; 25(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 7415564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acceptable levels of tonal and broad-band repetitive and continuous sounds during the performance of nonauditory tasks. Landström U; Kjellberg A; Byström M Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Dec; 81(3 Pt 1):803-16. PubMed ID: 8668437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Assessment of low frequency noise annoyance in steering premises according to subjective annoyance rating by workers. A pilot study]. Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska M; Dudarewicz A; Waszkowska M Med Pr; 2001; 52(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 11928677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relation between annoyance and single-number quantities for rating heavy-weight floor impact sound insulation in wooden houses. Ryu J; Sato H; Kurakata K; Hiramitsu A; Tanaka M; Hirota T J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3047-55. PubMed ID: 21568408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of loudness-level weightings for assessing the annoyance of environmental noise. Schomer PD; Suzuki Y; Saito F J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2390-7. PubMed ID: 11757929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Annoyance from industrial noise: indicators for a wide variety of industrial sources. Alayrac M; Marquis-Favre C; Viollon S; Morel J; Le Nost G J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1128-39. PubMed ID: 20815449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating roadside noise barriers using an annoyance-reduction criterion. Nilsson ME; Andéhn M; Leśna P J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3561-7. PubMed ID: 19206785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Annoyance of bandpass-filtered noises in relation to the factor extracted from autocorrelation function. Soeta Y; Maruo T; Ando Y J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3275-8. PubMed ID: 15658678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating noise in social context: the effect of procedural unfairness on noise annoyance judgments. Maris E; Stallen PJ; Vermunt R; Steensma H J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3483-94. PubMed ID: 18247757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Continuous noise, intermittent noise, and annoyance. Dornic S; Laaksonen T Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Feb; 68(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 2928031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Noise annoyance with regard to neurophysiological sensitivity, subjective noise sensitivity and personality variables. Ohrström E; Björkman M; Rylander R Psychol Med; 1988 Aug; 18(3):605-13. PubMed ID: 3186864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of noise frequency on performance and annoyance for women and men. Key KF; Payne MC Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Apr; 52(2):435-41. PubMed ID: 7255055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A first-principles model for estimating the prevalence of annoyance with aircraft noise exposure. Fidell S; Mestre V; Schomer P; Berry B; Gjestland T; Vallet M; Reid T J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):791-806. PubMed ID: 21877795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A field study of the exposure-annoyance relationship of military shooting noise. Brink M; Wunderli JM J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2301-11. PubMed ID: 20370012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The subjective effect of low frequency content in road traffic noise. Torija AJ; Flindell IH J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):189-98. PubMed ID: 25618050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noise annoyance during the performance of different nonauditory tasks. Kjellberg A; Sköldström B Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Aug; 73(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 1945718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Annoyance responses to stable and changing aircraft noise exposure. Brink M; Wirth KE; Schierz C; Thomann G; Bauer G J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):2930-41. PubMed ID: 19045781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the temporal weighting of annoyance and loudness. Dittrich K; Oberfeld D J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3168-78. PubMed ID: 20000930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]