These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8668467)

  • 1. A new method for prescribing exercise: three-point ratings of perceived exertion.
    Dunbar CC; Kalinski MI; Robertson RJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Feb; 82(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 8668467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The slope method for prescribing exercise with ratings of perceived exertion (RPE).
    Dunbar CC; Bursztyn DA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Aug; 83(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 8873179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-point method of prescribing exercise with ratings of perceived exertion is valid for cardiac patients.
    Dunbar CC; Glickman-Weiss EL; Edwards WW; Conley P; Quiroz A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Oct; 83(2):384-6. PubMed ID: 8902008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A submaximal treadmill test for developing target ratings of perceived exertion for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation.
    Dunbar CC; Glickman-Weiss EL; Bursztyn DA; Kurtich M; Quiroz A; Conley P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):755-9. PubMed ID: 9885032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and reproducibility of an exercise prescription based on Ratings of Perceived Exertion for treadmill and cycle ergometer exercise.
    Dunbar CC; Goris C; Michielli DW; Kalinski MI
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Jun; 78(3 Pt 2):1335-44. PubMed ID: 7936963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The validity of regulating exercise intensity by ratings of perceived exertion.
    Dunbar CC; Robertson RJ; Baun R; Blandin MF; Metz K; Burdett R; Goss FL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1992 Jan; 24(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 1549002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychological affect at different ratings of perceived exertion in high- and low-active women: a study using a production protocol.
    Parfitt G; Eston R; Connolly D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Jun; 82(3 Pt 1):1035-42. PubMed ID: 8774048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ratings of perceived exertion in braille: validity and reliability in production mode.
    Buckley JP; Eston RG; Sim J
    Br J Sports Med; 2000 Aug; 34(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 10953905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity of the Borg perceived exertion scale for use in semirecumbent ergometry during immersion in water.
    Robertson R; Goss F; Michael T; Moyna N; Gordon P; Visich P; Kang J; Angelopoulos T; Dasilva S; Metz K
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Aug; 83(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 8873165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of music on ratings of perceived exertion during 20 minutes of moderate intensity exercise.
    Potteiger JA; Schroeder JM; Goff KL
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):848-54. PubMed ID: 11153860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The prediction of maximal oxygen uptake from submaximal ratings of perceived exertion elicited during the multistage fitness test.
    Davies RC; Rowlands AV; Eston RG
    Br J Sports Med; 2008 Dec; 42(12):1006-10. PubMed ID: 18308896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of exercise modality on ratings of perceived exertion at various lactate concentrations.
    Hetzler RK; Seip RL; Boutcher SH; Pierce E; Snead D; Weltman A
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1991 Jan; 23(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 1997817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) as an index of aerobic endurance during local and general exercises.
    Garcin M; Vautier JF; Vandewalle H; Monod H
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1105-14. PubMed ID: 9715670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis.
    Chen MJ; Fan X; Moe ST
    J Sports Sci; 2002 Nov; 20(11):873-99. PubMed ID: 12430990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of aerobic capacity from submaximal cycle ergometry in women.
    Hartung GH; Blancq RJ; Lally DA; Krock LP
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Mar; 27(3):452-7. PubMed ID: 7752875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differentiated perceived exertion and self-regulated wheelchair exercise.
    Paulson TA; Bishop NC; Eston RG; Goosey-Tolfrey VL
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Nov; 94(11):2269-76. PubMed ID: 23562415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regulating exercise intensity using ratings of perceived exertion during arm and leg ergometry.
    Kang J; Chaloupka EC; Mastrangelo MA; Donnelly MS; Martz WP; Robertson RJ
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1998 Aug; 78(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 9721003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physiological responses and perceptions of exertion in a step aerobics session.
    Sutherland R; Wilson J; Aitchison T; Grant S
    J Sports Sci; 1999 Jun; 17(6):495-503. PubMed ID: 10404498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceived exertion during physical exercise among individuals high and low in fitness.
    Travlos AK; Marisi DQ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Apr; 82(2):419-24. PubMed ID: 8724910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regulation of exercise intensity using ratings of perceived exertion during passive visual distraction.
    Hull GR; Potteiger JA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Oct; 89(2):684-94. PubMed ID: 10597605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.