These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8668759)
21. 'The public is too subjective': public involvement at different levels of health-care decision making. Litva A; Coast J; Donovan J; Eyles J; Shepherd M; Tacchi J; Abelson J; Morgan K Soc Sci Med; 2002 Jun; 54(12):1825-37. PubMed ID: 12113438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Managerialism and active citizenship in Britain's reformed health service: power and community in an era of decentralisation. Milewa T; Valentine J; Calnan M Soc Sci Med; 1998 Aug; 47(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 9680234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Locality commissioning. Local heroes. Freake D; Crowley P; Steiner M; Drinkwater C Health Serv J; 1997 Jul; 107(5561):28-9. PubMed ID: 10169046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Using programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) to set priorities: reflections from a qualitative assessment in an English Primary Care Trust. Goodwin E; Frew EJ Soc Sci Med; 2013 Dec; 98():162-8. PubMed ID: 24331895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is it possible to have a truly open debate on the rationing of health care resources. Nelson J Nurs Times; 1999 Jun 2-8; 95(22):11. PubMed ID: 10455698 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Integrity, ambiguity or duplicity? NHS consultation with the public. Peck E Health Serv Manage Res; 1998 Nov; 11(4):201-10. PubMed ID: 10338688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Rationing and the health authority. Hope T; Hicks N; Reynolds DJ; Crisp R; Griffiths S BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7165):1067-9. PubMed ID: 9774299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Redesign and commissioning of sexual health services in England - a qualitative study. Walker IF; Leigh-Hunt N; Lee ACK Public Health; 2016 Oct; 139():134-140. PubMed ID: 27372230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Commissioning for health improvement following the 2012 health and social care reforms in England: what has changed? Gadsby EW; Peckham S; Coleman A; Bramwell D; Perkins N; Jenkins LM BMC Public Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):211. PubMed ID: 28212638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The return of public health to local government in England: changing the parameters of the public health prioritization debate? Marks L; Hunter DJ; Scalabrini S; Gray J; McCafferty S; Payne N; Peckham S; Salway S; Thokala P Public Health; 2015 Sep; 129(9):1194-203. PubMed ID: 26298589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Choices without reasons: citizens' juries and policy evaluation. Price D J Med Ethics; 2000 Aug; 26(4):272-6. PubMed ID: 10951923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden. Fredriksson M; Eriksson M; Tritter J BMC Public Health; 2017 Jul; 18(1):18. PubMed ID: 28709413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Desperately seeking solutions: rationing dilemmas in health care. Hunter DJ Aust Health Rev; 1993; 16(2):130-47. PubMed ID: 10129456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Public participation in decision-making on the coverage of new antivirals for hepatitis C. Kieslich K; Ahn J; Badano G; Chalkidou K; Cubillos L; Hauegen RC; Henshall C; Krubiner CB; Littlejohns P; Lu L; Pearson SD; Rid A; Whitty JA; Wilson J J Health Organ Manag; 2016 Aug; 30(5):769-85. PubMed ID: 27468625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Whose voices? Patient and public involvement in clinical commissioning. O'Shea A; Chambers M; Boaz A Health Expect; 2017 Jun; 20(3):484-494. PubMed ID: 27358109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The rationing debate. Central government should have a greater role in rationing decisions. The case for. Lenaghan J BMJ; 1997 Mar; 314(7085):967-70. PubMed ID: 9099126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Factors that influence the way local communities respond to consultation processes about major service change: A qualitative study. Barratt H; Harrison DA; Raine R; Fulop NJ Health Policy; 2015 Sep; 119(9):1210-7. PubMed ID: 25975768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Widening the debate? Consultation and participation in local health care planning in the English and Swedish health services. North N; Werkö S Int J Health Serv; 2002; 32(4):781-98. PubMed ID: 12456125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The problem with rational approaches to reforming the NHS. Smith T Qual Saf Health Care; 2002 Dec; 11(4):383-6. PubMed ID: 12468703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The HSJ interview: Dr Evan Harris. Gruel intentions. Interview by Lyn Whitfield. Harris E Health Serv J; 2003 May; 113(5856):20-2. PubMed ID: 12789750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]