122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8668802)
21. [Preliminary clinical applications of asymmetric screen-film systems in chest radiography].
Higashida Y; Katsuda N; Tochihara S; Yoshioka S; Bussaka H; Tomiguchi S; Takada T; Matsumoto M; Takahashi M; Yoshida A
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Feb; 54(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 8121782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Claussen CD
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Filter wheel equalization in chest radiography: demonstration with a prototype system.
Boone JM; Duryea J; Moore EH
Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 7644654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mottle on computed radiographs of the chest in pediatric patients.
Huda W; Slone RM; Belden CJ; Williams JL; Cumming WA; Palmer CK
Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):249-52. PubMed ID: 8633153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Experimental and clinical studies on utility of advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary mass lesions].
Itouji E; Kono M
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Nov; 54(13):1252-62. PubMed ID: 7610028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms.
Körner M; Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser M; Pfeifer KJ
Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality.
Uffmann M; Neitzel U; Prokop M; Kabalan N; Weber M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):642-50. PubMed ID: 15858104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of a new dual characteristic film-screen system (insight) with a standard film-screen system for chest radiology.
Logan PM; Tunney T; McCoy CT; Masterson J
Br J Radiol; 1994 Feb; 67(794):162-5. PubMed ID: 8130978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Study of X-ray filter and peak kilovoltage in film-screen chest radiographs in regard to detection of simulated pulmonary nodules: comparison between film-screen combination and FCR].
Kiyono K; Sone S; Sakai F; Kawai T; Karakida O; Kasuga T; Hirano H; Matsumoto T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Nov; 54(13):1237-44. PubMed ID: 7610026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Variable compensation chest radiography performed with a computed radiography system: design considerations and initial clinical experience.
Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Goodman PC; Patz EF; Ravin CE
Radiology; 1993 Apr; 187(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 8451437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Digital chest imaging with a selenium detector: comparison with conventional radiography for visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
van Heesewijk HP; Neitzel U; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7645464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A reduction in radiographic exposure and image quality in film screen postero-anterior chest radiography.
Egbe NO; Egong EA; Ekpo EU; Inah GB
Niger J Med; 2012; 21(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 23301442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interpretation of normal anatomic structures on chest radiography: comparison of Fuji computed radiography (FCR) 5501D with FCR 5000 and screen-film system.
Nakashima K; Ashizawa K; Ochi M; Hashmi R; Hayashi K; Gotoh S; Honda S; Igarashi A; Komaki T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 12540822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ability of chest X-ray to detect faint shadows documented as ground-glass attenuation in images of computed tomography: a comparison between flat-panel detector radiography and film-screen radiography.
Nagatani Y; Nitta N; Ikeda M; Kitahara H; Otani H; Seko A; Tanaka T; Murakami Y; Takahashi M; Murata K
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Sep; 75(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19481399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.
Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Beam CA; Ravin CE
Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [The use of an asymmetric film-screen combination for the imaging of round pulmonary foci].
Müller RD; Wähling S; Hirche H; Voss M; Gocke P; Gocke C; Blendl C; Turowski B; Buddenbrock B; John V
Rofo; 1995 Oct; 163(4):290-6. PubMed ID: 7579214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Clinical utility of computed radiography (CR) for the diagnosis of lung cancer].
Itouji E; Kono M; Adachi S; Yamasaki K; Kusumoto M; Sakai E; Endo M; Nakamura T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Jun; 53(6):655-66. PubMed ID: 8337108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
