BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8668802)

  • 41. [Value of the AMBER system in interstitial lung changes].
    Dammann F; Sokiranski R; Schäfer C; Brambs HJ; Claussen CD
    Rofo; 1995 Aug; 163(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 7670027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Conventional radiography and digital radiography of the thorax: evaluation of anatomo-radiological parameters].
    Del Maschio A; Vanzulli A; Panizza P; Del Maschio M; Rodighiero M; Cucchi E; Zanello A; Sironi S
    Radiol Med; 1989 Jun; 77(6):621-5. PubMed ID: 2756178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Thoracic radiography in intensive care units. Comparison of an asymmetric film-screen-grid combination with an L-film].
    Luska G; von Boetticher H; Amling B; Herzog R
    Rofo; 1995 Aug; 163(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 7670010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [The value of the InSight HC asymmetric film-screen system in thoracic diagnosis].
    Häussler MD; Lenzen H; Reckels C; Peters PE
    Rofo; 1994 Mar; 160(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 8136481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [The visibility of a central venous catheter using digital luminescence radiography in intensive care radiology].
    Galanski M; Prokop M; Thorns E; Oestmann JW; Reichelt S; Haubitz B; Milbradt H; Gräser A; Verner L; Schaefer C
    Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 1733477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Computed equalization radiography: preliminary clinical evaluation.
    Goodman LR; Wilson CR; Kim CS
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 8421742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Detection of simulated chest lesions: comparison of a conventional screen-film combination, an asymmetric screen-film system, and storage phosphor radiography.
    Leppert AG; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 7892482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Computed radiography versus mobile direct radiography for bedside chest radiographs: impact of dose on image quality and reader agreement.
    De Boo DW; Weber M; Deurloo EE; Streekstra GJ; Freling NJ; Dongelmans DA; Schaefer-Prokop CM
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Sep; 66(9):826-32. PubMed ID: 21570679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Technical advances in chest radiography.
    MacMahon H; Vyborny C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1049-59. PubMed ID: 7976874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A new asymmetric screen-film combination for conventional chest radiography: evaluation in 50 patients.
    Swensen SJ; Gray JE; Brown LR; Aughenbaugh GL; Harms GF; Stears J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):483-6. PubMed ID: 8430540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Subtle pulmonary disease: detection with computed radiography versus conventional chest radiography.
    Ishigaki T; Endo T; Ikeda M; Kono M; Yoshida S; Ikezoe J; Murata K; Matsumoto M
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 8816520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Experiences with digital luminescence radiography (DLR) in pediatric radiology].
    Vosshenrich R; Weigel W; Fischer U; Funke M; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1992 Feb; 156(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 1739766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Reduction of patient exposure by the use of digital luminescence radiography].
    Seifert H; Chapot C
    J Radiol; 1999 Nov; 80(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 10592912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Optimum tube voltage for chest radiographs obtained by psychophysical analysis.
    Asai Y; Tanabe Y; Ozaki Y; Kubota H; Matsumoto M; Kanamori H
    Med Phys; 1998 Nov; 25(11):2170-5. PubMed ID: 9829241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Performance of various X-ray film/screen systems in demonstrating small simulated low-density lung nodules.
    Maruyama Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):509-15. PubMed ID: 9778937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy.
    Chotas HG; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):679-82. PubMed ID: 11230639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
    Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.