These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8668802)

  • 61. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system.
    Prato A; Ropolo R; Fava C
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Small object contrast in AMBER and conventional chest radiography.
    Chotas HG; Van Metter RL; Johnson GA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1991 Sep; 180(3):853-9. PubMed ID: 1871306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Detection of simulated lung nodules evaluated with various film/screen systems].
    Li-Feng
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 Feb; 57(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 9077091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Chest radiography: estimated lung volume and projected area obscured by the heart, mediastinum, and diaphragm.
    Chotas HG; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):403-4. PubMed ID: 7972752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Detection of monitoring materials on bedside chest radiographs with the most recent generation of storage phosphor plates: dose increase does not improve detection performance.
    Eisenhuber E; Stadler A; Prokop M; Fuchsjager M; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):216-21. PubMed ID: 12668747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Single-exposure conventional and computed radiography image acquisition.
    Chotas HG; Dobbins JT; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):438-45. PubMed ID: 2055742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
    Andriole KP
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Automated characterization of perceptual quality of clinical chest radiographs: validation and calibration to observer preference.
    Samei E; Lin Y; Choudhury KR; McAdams HP
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111918. PubMed ID: 25370651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A comparison of conventional film, CR hard copy and PACS soft copy images of the chest: analyses of ROC curves and inter-observer agreement.
    Weatherburn GC; Ridout D; Strickland NH; Robins P; Glastonbury CM; Curati W; Harvey C; Shadbolt C
    Eur J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):206-14. PubMed ID: 12927664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Histogram-directed processing of digital chest images.
    McAdams HP; Johnson GA; Suddarth SA; Ravin CE
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Mar; 21(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 3957599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Performance of a single lookup table (LUT) for displaying chest CT images.
    John A; Huda W; Scalzetti EM; Ogden KM; Roskopf ML
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Jun; 11(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 15172363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Radiographic reporting directly from the TV monitor of a digital chest radiography system.
    Kheddache S; Tylén U; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 1889435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Comparison of the low-contrast detectability of a screen-film system and third generation computed radiography.
    Cook LT; Insana MF; McFadden MA; Hall TJ; Cox GG
    Med Phys; 1994 May; 21(5):691-5. PubMed ID: 7935205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Dynamic range control processing of digital chest images. A clinical evaluation.
    Ikezoe J; Takeuchi N; Kido S; Kondoh H; Johkoh T; Kohno N; Arisawa J; Kozuka T; Tanaka H; Nakajima N; Kato H
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Jan; 37(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 8611313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Automated segmentation of anatomic regions in chest radiographs using an adaptive-sized hybrid neural network.
    Tsujii O; Freedman MT; Mun SK
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):998-1007. PubMed ID: 9650190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A comparison of film-screen, CR and DR: a community hospital time-motion study.
    Mehta M; Lee T
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(6):38-42. PubMed ID: 14699926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. [Development of breathing chest radiography: study of exposure timing].
    Tanaka R; Sanada S; Kobayashi T; Suzuki M; Matsui T; Inoue H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Aug; 59(8):984-92. PubMed ID: 12960952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Interobserver agreement using computed radiography in the adult intensive care unit.
    Maguire WM; Herman PG; Khan A; Simon-Gabor M; Cruz V; Eacobacci TM
    Acad Radiol; 1994 Sep; 1(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9419458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Screen-film versus computed radiography imaging of the hand: a direct comparison.
    Swee RG; Gray JE; Beabout JW; McLeod RA; Cooper KL; Bond JR; Wenger DE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):539-42. PubMed ID: 9016243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Clinical evaluation of manual and automatic exposure control techniques in film-based chest radiography.
    Ismailos E; Mastorakou I; Kelekis NL; Papadopoulos KP; Efstathopoulos EP; Panayiotakis G; Kelekis DA
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jul; 69(823):650-4. PubMed ID: 8696702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.