85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8668810)
1. Value of selective second-look sonography by radiologists.
Tessler FN; Tublin ME; Peters JC; Jie T; Peters TL
Radiology; 1996 May; 199(2):551-3. PubMed ID: 8668810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Case for active physician involvement in US practice.
Chan V; Hanbidge A; Wilson S; Pron G; Moore L
Radiology; 1996 May; 199(2):555-60. PubMed ID: 8668811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level 1 trauma center.
Carney E; Kempf J; DeCarvalho V; Yudd A; Nosher J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 12876012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, part I].
Krug B; Böttge M; Coburger S; Reineke T; Zähringer M; V Smekal U; Winnekendonk G; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 12525980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When does a radiologist's recommendation for follow-up result in high-cost imaging?
Lee SI; Krishnaraj A; Chatterji M; Dreyer KJ; Thrall JH; Hahn PF
Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):544-9. PubMed ID: 22084210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PACS in sonography: accuracy of interpretation using film compared with monitor display. Picture archiving and communication systems.
Hertzberg BS; Kliewer MA; Paulson EK; Sheafor DH; Freed KS; Bowie JD; Carroll BA; DeLong DH; Nelson RC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Nov; 173(5):1175-9. PubMed ID: 10541084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An audit of a radiographer based ultrasound service.
Weston MJ; Morse A; Slack NF
Br J Radiol; 1994 Jul; 67(799):665-7. PubMed ID: 8062007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An audit of the role of the sonographer in non-obstetric ultrasound.
Bates JA; Conlon RM; Irving HC
Clin Radiol; 1994 Sep; 49(9):617-20. PubMed ID: 7955888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of factors that affect the quality of performance and interpretation of sonography of adnexal masses.
Levine D; Asch E; Mehta TS; Broder J; O'Donnell C; Hecht JL
J Ultrasound Med; 2008 May; 27(5):721-8. PubMed ID: 18424647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preliminary findings from a teleultrasound study in Alberta.
Johnson MA; Davis P; McEwan AJ; Jhangri GS; Warshawski R; Gargum A; Ethier J; Anderson WW
Telemed J; 1998; 4(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 9831751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preliminary reports in the emergency department: is a subspecialist radiologist more accurate than a radiology resident?
Branstetter BF; Morgan MB; Nesbit CE; Phillips JA; Lionetti DM; Chang PJ; Towers JD
Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 17236993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Part II].
Krug B; Boettge M; Reineke T; Coburger S; Zähringer M; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K
Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):346-60. PubMed ID: 12635011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of the RADPEER™ scoring language to interpretation discrepancies between diagnostic radiology residents and faculty radiologists.
Maloney E; Lomasney LM; Schomer L
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Apr; 9(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 22469377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Development of ultrasonography in a radiological university department from 1994 to 2001].
Krug B; Stützer H; Wolters U; Mauch C; Staib P; Töx U; Steffen HM; Warm M; Ghafur S; Araba F; Beuckelmann D; König DP; Zähringer M; Palm S; Von Pritzbuer E; Schrappe M
Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):767-75. PubMed ID: 12063609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Emergency department image interpretation services at private community hospitals.
Saketkhoo DD; Bhargavan M; Sunshine JH; Forman HP
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 15068948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital.
Ruchman RB; Jaeger J; Wiggins EF; Seinfeld S; Thakral V; Bolla S; Wallach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 17715095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiographer-acquired and radiologist-reviewed ultrasound examination--agreement with radiologist's bedside evaluation.
Stenman C; Thorelius L; Knutsson A; Smedby Ö
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 21498329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiologist and Sonographer Interpretation Discrepancies for Biliary Sonographic Findings: Our Experience.
Dawkins A; George N; Ganesh H; Ayoob A; Lee J; Nair R; Kiper C; Duncan K; Stevens S
Ultrasound Q; 2017 Dec; 33(4):261-264. PubMed ID: 28399070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Caveat reporting in ultrasound interpretation of surgical pathology: a comparison of sonographer versus radiologist.
Garcea G; Mahmoud A; Ong SL; Rees Y; Berry DP; Dennison AR
J Eval Clin Pract; 2010 Feb; 16(1):97-9. PubMed ID: 20074303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discordance in interpretation of chest radiographs between pediatric intensivists and a radiologist: impact on patient management.
Nesterova GV; Leftridge CA; Natarajan AR; Appel HJ; Bautista MV; Hauser GJ
J Crit Care; 2010 Jun; 25(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 19682850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
