These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8668873)

  • 1. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to data distorted from normality by floor effects: homogeneous regression slopes.
    Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(5):477-96. PubMed ID: 8668873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to ordinal scaled data as arising in randomized controlled trials.
    Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1317-34. PubMed ID: 12687657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of covariance using the rank transformation.
    Conover WJ; Iman RL
    Biometrics; 1982 Sep; 38(3):715-24. PubMed ID: 7171697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Power comparison of robust approximate and non-parametric tests for the analysis of cross-over trials.
    Correa JA; Bellavance F
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(8):1185-96. PubMed ID: 11304735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
    Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Omnibus hypothesis testing in dominance-based ordinal multiple regression.
    Long JD
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Sep; 10(3):329-51. PubMed ID: 16221032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A note on the power of Fisher's least significant difference procedure.
    Meier U
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):253-63. PubMed ID: 17128424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the adequacy of variance function in heteroscedastic regression models.
    Wang L; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1218-25. PubMed ID: 17484775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trimmed weighted Simes' test for two one-sided hypotheses with arbitrarily correlated test statistics.
    Brannath W; Bretz F; Maurer W; Sarkar S
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):885-98. PubMed ID: 20014203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tests of independence for bivariate survival data.
    Shih JH; Louis TA
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1440-9. PubMed ID: 8962462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing approaches for overdispersion in poisson regression versus the generalized poisson model.
    Yang Z; Hardin JW; Addy CL; Vuong QH
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):565-84. PubMed ID: 17638291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The type I error and power of non-parametric logrank and Wilcoxon tests with adjustment for covariates--a simulation study.
    Jiang H; Symanowski J; Paul S; Qu Y; Zagar A; Hong S
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5850-60. PubMed ID: 18759373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparisons of two-part models with competitors.
    Lachenbruch PA
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(8):1215-34. PubMed ID: 11304737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing the regression slopes of independent groups.
    Ng M; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):319-40. PubMed ID: 19807946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On estimation of the variance in Cochran-Armitage trend tests for genetic association using case-control studies.
    Zheng G; Gastwirth JL
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(18):3150-9. PubMed ID: 16397860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs.
    Cribbie RA; Fiksenbaum L; Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 21426313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A strategy to evaluate a covariate by group interaction in an analysis of covariance.
    Leon AC; Portera L; Lowell K; Rheinheimer D
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 1998; 34(4):805-9. PubMed ID: 10513456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses.
    MacCallum RC; Browne MW; Cai L
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Mar; 11(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 16594765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power and robustness of linkage tests for quantitative traits in general pedigrees.
    Chen WM; Broman KW; Liang KY
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Jan; 28(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 15493059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.