These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8669188)
1. Diagnostic efficacy and validity of the ThinPrep method in cervical cytology. Tezuka F; Oikawa H; Shuki H; Higashiiwai H Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8669188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology. Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices. Rinas AC; Mittman BW; Le LV; Hartmann K; Cayless J; Singh HK Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 16514841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new look at cervical cytology. ThinPrep multicenter trial results. Hutchinson ML; Agarwal P; Denault T; Berger B; Cibas ES Acta Cytol; 1992; 36(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 1636340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening. Lee KR; Ashfaq R; Birdsong GG; Corkill ME; McIntosh KM; Inhorn SL Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 9241308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ThinPrep Pap Test. Accuracy for glandular disease. Ashfaq R; Gibbons D; Vela C; Saboorian MH; Iliya F Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 9987455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of ThinPrep preparation of cervical smears: a 1,000-case, investigator-sponsored study. Awen C; Hathway S; Eddy W; Voskuil R; Janes C Diagn Cytopathol; 1994; 11(1):33-6; discussion 36-7. PubMed ID: 7956657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of conventional Papanicolaou tests and a fluid-based thin-layer method. Limaye A; Connor AJ; Huang X; Luff R Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Feb; 127(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 12562235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Liquid phase cytology in the primary screening for cervical cancer: a multicenter study]. Monsonégo J; Autillo-Touati A; Bergeron C; Dachez R; Liaras J; Saurel J; Zerat L; Chatelain P; Mottot C Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2001 Nov; 29(11):799-807. PubMed ID: 11770273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Australian trial of ThinPrep: a new cytopreparatory technique. Laverty CR; Thurloe JK; Redman NL; Farnsworth A Cytopathology; 1995 Jun; 6(3):140-8. PubMed ID: 7669924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait. Luthra UK; Chishti M; Dey P; Jolly SV; Abdulla M; Das DK; Sugathan TN; Ajrawi MT; George J; George SS; Aziz AA; al-Juwaiser A; Karim FA; Mallik MK; Sheikh ZA; Khan S Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 11917577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ThinPrep Processor. Clinical trials demonstrate an increased detection rate of abnormal cervical cytologic specimens. Wilbur DC; Cibas ES; Merritt S; James LP; Berger BM; Bonfiglio TA Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 8116577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey. Abulafia O; Pezzullo JC; Sherer DM Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Jul; 90(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 12821354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of cellular residue in the ThinPrep PreservCyt vial. Massarani-Wafai R; Bakhos R; Wojcik EM; Selvaggi SM Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Sep; 23(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 10945912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical results of a split sample liquid-based cytology (ThinPrep) study of 4,322 patients in a Turkish institution. Tuncer ZS; Başaran M; Sezgin Y; Firat P; Mocan Kuzey G Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2005; 26(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 16398228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Homogeneous sampling accounts for the increased diagnostic accuracy using the ThinPrep Processor. Hutchinson ML; Isenstein LM; Goodman A; Hurley AA; Douglass KL; Mui KK; Patten FW; Zahniser DJ Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 8116578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving cervical cytology screening in a remote, high risk population. Shield PW; Nolan GR; Phillips GE; Cummings MC Med J Aust; 1999 Mar; 170(6):255-8. PubMed ID: 10212646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial. McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]