These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8669190)

  • 1. Influence of smear quality on the rate of detecting significant cervical cytologic abnormalities.
    Henry JA; Wadehra V
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):529-35. PubMed ID: 8669190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Order of endocervical and ectocervical cytologic sampling and the quality of the Papanicolaou smear.
    Eisenberger D; Hernandez E; Tener T; Atkinson BF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):755-8. PubMed ID: 9351759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality grading for cervical smears.
    Wadehra V; Sankar K
    Cytopathology; 1996 Oct; 7(5):301-9. PubMed ID: 8911753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of different sampling techniques on smear quality and the diagnosis of cytological abnormalities in cervical screening.
    Williamson SL; Hair T; Wadehra V
    Cytopathology; 1997 Jun; 8(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 9202894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear.
    Marchand L; Mundt M; Klein G; Agarwal SC
    WMJ; 2005 Aug; 104(6):51-5. PubMed ID: 16218317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method].
    Ivanov S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of the quality of Papanicolaou smears on the detection of cytologic abnormalities.
    Mintzer M; Curtis P; Resnick JC; Morrell D
    Cancer; 1999 Jun; 87(3):113-7. PubMed ID: 10385441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of the sampling sequence on the quality of Papanicolaou smear.
    Rahnama P; Faghihzadeh S; Ziaei S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 15670299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
    Hutchinson M; Fertitta L; Goldbaum B; Hamza M; Vanerian S; Isenstein L
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of seven cell collection devices for cervical smears.
    Kohlberger PD; Stani J; Gitsch G; Kieback DG; Breitenecker G
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(6):1023-6. PubMed ID: 10578973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should we report cervical smears lacking endocervical component as unsatisfactory?
    Sidawy MK; Tabbara SO; Silverberg SG
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1992; 8(6):567-70. PubMed ID: 1468332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait.
    Luthra UK; Chishti M; Dey P; Jolly SV; Abdulla M; Das DK; Sugathan TN; Ajrawi MT; George J; George SS; Aziz AA; al-Juwaiser A; Karim FA; Mallik MK; Sheikh ZA; Khan S
    Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 11917577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between the diagnosis of epithelial abnormalities and the composition of cervical smears.
    Vooijs PG; Elias A; van der Graaf Y; Veling S
    Acta Cytol; 1985; 29(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 3859130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical cancer screening in Canadian Native women. Adequacy of the Papanicolaou smear.
    Hislop TG; Band PR; Deschamps M; Clarke HF; Smith JM; Ng VT
    Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 8291352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraobserver and interobserver variability in the quality assessment of cervical smears.
    Klinkhamer PJ; Vooijs GP; de Haan AF
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 2929223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush.
    Lo L; Jordan J
    Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the adequacy of Pap smears.
    Baker RM
    Am Fam Physician; 1989 Jun; 39(6):109-14. PubMed ID: 2729036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid-based cytology.
    Arbyn M; Herbert A; Schenck U; Nieminen P; Jordan J; Mcgoogan E; Patnick J; Bergeron C; Baldauf JJ; Klinkhamer P; Bulten J; Martin-Hirsch P
    Cytopathology; 2007 Jun; 18(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 17573762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.