These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8670923)

  • 1. Morphological associations between the Angle classes.
    Dibbets JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 8670923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Airway volume for different dentofacial skeletal patterns.
    El H; Palomo JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e511-21. PubMed ID: 21640863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cranial base features in skeletal Class III patients.
    Proff P; Will F; Bokan I; Fanghänel J; Gedrange T
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 18416608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The variability of some craniofacial dimensions.
    Kerr WJ; Ford I
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 1928822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships.
    Hurmerinta K; Rahkamo A; Haavikko K
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Jun; 105(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9249188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mandibular form and position in 10-year-old boys.
    Kerr WJ; Miller S; Ayme B; Wilhelm N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 8059745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Base of the skull morphology and Class III malocclusion in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Tinano MM; Martins MA; Bendo CB; Mazzieiro Ê
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 25741829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion.
    Dhopatkar A; Bhatia S; Rock P
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 12401055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 3. Angle Class III malocclusion comparatively analyzed with Class I and Class II patients (author's transl)].
    Iwasawa T; Shimizu N; Yamauchi E; Yamada W; Fujiwara K
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Jun; 39(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 6935310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Class I and Class III malocclusion sub-groupings related to headform type.
    Martone VD; Enlow DH; Hans MG; Broadbent BH; Oyen O
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(1):35-42; discussion 43-4. PubMed ID: 1554161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the YEN angle.
    Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 19582259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing skeletal relationships using the cervical vertebral curvature.
    Shaikh A; Khan M; Rashna HS
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(4):27-31. PubMed ID: 22360079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Craniofacial adaptations induced by chincup therapy in Class III patients.
    Deguchi T; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Feb; 115(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 9971929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Barbosa LAG; Araujo E; Behrents RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):914-920. PubMed ID: 28457269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Craniofacial morphology in children with Angle Class II-1 malocclusion with and without deepbite.
    Karlsen AT
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(6):437-46. PubMed ID: 7864465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cranial base in subjects with dental and skeletal Class II.
    Bacon W; Eiller V; Hildwein M; Dubois G
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Jun; 14(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 1302466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The inadequacy of the Y-axis of growth (SNGn) for the vertical pattern assessment in patients with sagittal discrepancies.
    Paranhos LR; Brando TM; Kaieda AK; Ramos AL; Torres FC
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Mar; 15(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 25095838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pharyngeal airway characterization in adolescents related to facial skeletal pattern: a preliminary study.
    Claudino LV; Mattos CT; Ruellas AC; Sant' Anna EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):799-809. PubMed ID: 23726330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective measures as indicators for facial esthetics in white adolescents.
    Kiekens RM; Maltha JC; van't Hof MA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 16808558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.