These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8671164)

  • 1. Randomized controlled trial of cervical cap with intracervical reservoir versus standard intracervical injection to inseminate cryopreserved donor semen.
    Coulson C; McLaughlin EA; Harris S; Ford WC; Hull MG
    Hum Reprod; 1996 Jan; 11(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 8671164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective, randomized, cross-over comparison of two methods of artificial insemination by donor on the incidence of conception: intracervical insemination by straw versus cervical cap.
    Flierman PA; Hogerzeil HV; Hemrika DJ
    Hum Reprod; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1945-8. PubMed ID: 9363712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a cohort study.
    Kop PA; van Wely M; Mol BW; de Melker AA; Janssens PM; Arends B; Curfs MH; Kortman M; Nap A; Rijnders E; Roovers JP; Ruis H; Simons AH; Repping S; van der Veen F; Mochtar MH
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 25637621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of halving the standard dose of cryopreserved semen for donor insemination: a controlled study of conception rates.
    Corrigan E; McLaughlin EA; Coulson C; Ford WC; Hull MG
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Feb; 9(2):330-3. PubMed ID: 8027291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does intrauterine insemination offer an advantage to cervical cap insemination in a donor insemination program?
    Williams DB; Moley KH; Cholewa C; Odem RR; Willand J; Gast MJ
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Feb; 63(2):295-8. PubMed ID: 7843434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intrauterine insemination outperforms intracervical insemination in a randomized, controlled study with frozen, donor semen.
    Patton PE; Burry KA; Thurmond A; Novy MJ; Wolf DP
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Mar; 57(3):559-64. PubMed ID: 1740198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Intrauterine and intracervical insemination with frozen donor semen. A comparative study].
    Westergaard LG
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Sep; 153(38):2621-3. PubMed ID: 1949268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective randomized study of pregnancy rates following intrauterine and intracervical insemination using frozen donor sperm.
    Byrd W; Bradshaw K; Carr B; Edman C; Odom J; Ackerman G
    Fertil Steril; 1990 Mar; 53(3):521-7. PubMed ID: 2307249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of intrauterine versus intracervical insemination in fertile single women.
    Carroll N; Palmer JR
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Apr; 75(4):656-60. PubMed ID: 11287014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical insemination versus intra-uterine insemination of donor sperm for subfertility.
    Besselink DE; Farquhar C; Kremer JA; Marjoribanks J; O'Brien P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Apr; (2):CD000317. PubMed ID: 18425862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of intracervical, intrauterine, and intratubal techniques for donor insemination.
    Hurd WW; Randolph JF; Ansbacher R; Menge AC; Ohl DA; Brown AN
    Fertil Steril; 1993 Feb; 59(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 8425628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pregnancy rates with fresh versus computer-controlled cryopreserved semen for artificial insemination by donor in a private practice setting.
    DiMarzo SJ; Huang J; Kennedy JF; Villanueva B; Hebert SA; Young PE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jun; 162(6):1483-8; discussion 1488-90. PubMed ID: 2360580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intrauterine insemination-ready versus conventional semen cryopreservation for donor insemination: a comparison of retrospective results and a prospective, randomized trial.
    Wolf DP; Patton PE; Burry KA; Kaplan PF
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Jul; 76(1):181-5. PubMed ID: 11438340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intrauterine insemination with frozen sperm increases pregnancy rates in donor insemination cycles under gonadotropin stimulation.
    Matorras R; Gorostiaga A; Diez J; Corcóstegui B; Pijoan JI; Ramón O; Rodriguez-Escudero FJ
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Mar; 65(3):620-5. PubMed ID: 8774298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of cryopreserved semen quality and timed intrauterine insemination on pregnancy rate and gender of offspring in a donor insemination program.
    Sidhu RS; Sharma RK; Agarwal A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1997 Oct; 14(9):531-7. PubMed ID: 9401872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Therapeutic donor insemination with frozen semen.
    Scott SG; Mortimer D; Taylor PJ; Leader A; Pattinson HA
    CMAJ; 1990 Aug; 143(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 2383847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Artificial donor insemination: fresh versus frozen semen; the patient as her own control.
    Richter MA; Haning RV; Shapiro SS
    Fertil Steril; 1984 Feb; 41(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 6698221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The successful use of hyperstimulated washed therapeutic donor insemination after standard therapeutic donor insemination has failed.
    Dow MP; Jones JM; Dumesic DA; Lu Y; Shapiro SS
    Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1996; 41(6):516-21. PubMed ID: 9010745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Intrauterine insemination with donor semen. Treatment of involuntary childlessness caused by male infertility].
    Vilsbøll T; Helmsøe-Zinck L; Andersen AN
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Aug; 156(34):4826-9. PubMed ID: 7992417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methods to increase the success rate of artificial insemination with donor semen.
    Depypere HT; Gordts S; Campo R; Comhaire F
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Apr; 9(4):661-3. PubMed ID: 8046019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.