These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. ART reporting: the American view. Lobo RA Hum Reprod; 1996 Jul; 11(7):1369-70. PubMed ID: 8671468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Confidentiality. 7: Human fertilization and embryology issues. Dimond B Br J Nurs; 1999 Sep 9-22; 8(16):1108-9. PubMed ID: 10711048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discrimination against the infertile. The Supreme Court speaks. Wolf SM Minn Med; 1998 Oct; 81(10):49-52. PubMed ID: 9798392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Critical considerations on the legal regulation of sex selection (II)]. Pérez Alonso EJ Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2002; (17):99-124. PubMed ID: 12703111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the British and American approaches to regulating ART programmes. Feinman M; Sher G Hum Reprod; 1996 Jul; 11(7):1366-7. PubMed ID: 8671465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Uncommon misery: modern psychoanalytic perspectives on infertility. Giuliani J J Am Psychoanal Assoc; 2009 Feb; 57(1):215-26. PubMed ID: 19270258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. ART regulation: the Australia viewpoint. Matthews CD Hum Reprod; 1996 Jul; 11(7):1365-6. PubMed ID: 8671464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Childlessness in Cameroon: artificially assisted fertility or the customary law solution. Ngwafor EN Med Law; 1994; 13(3-4):297-306. PubMed ID: 7968305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A medico-legal evaluation of the use of assisted reproductive technologies in Turkey. Pelin SS Med Law; 1997; 16(4):789-93. PubMed ID: 9573715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal and ethical aspects in assisted reproductive techniques. The debate in Spain. Boada M; Veiga A; Quintana O Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2002; (17):205-14. PubMed ID: 12703115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Wish for children at any price? Possibilities and limits of reproduction medicine]. Rickmers K Kinderkrankenschwester; 2005 Dec; 24(12):505-6. PubMed ID: 16425891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Information versus choice in infertility treatment. Lancet; 1999 Jun; 353(9168):1895. PubMed ID: 10371560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Birth rights. Philpot T Nurs Stand; 2002 Aug 14-20; 16(48):16-7. PubMed ID: 12226878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Are adverse pregnancy and fetal outcomes more common with assisted reproductive technologies? What should patients be told? Gambone JC Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 49(1):123-33. PubMed ID: 16456348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Innovations in infertility treatment and the rush to market. Robertson JA Womens Health Issues; 1997; 7(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 9203862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Infertility and ethical policy. White GB Nursingconnections; 1988; 1(3):16-22. PubMed ID: 3059200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Procreative tourism. National law versus individual rights]. Nisand I Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Feb; 35(2):158-9; discussion 172-3. PubMed ID: 17258492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Treatments of sterility and multiple pregnancies in France: analysis and recommendations]. Antoine JM; Audebert A; Avril C; Belaisch-Allart J; Blondel B; Bréart G; Cohen J; Epelboin S; Fanchin R; L'Hélias LF; Garel M; Germond M; Hazout A; Hugues JN; Mandelbaum J; Montagut J; de Mouzon J; Olivennes F; Royère D Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004; 32(7-8):670-83. PubMed ID: 15450270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]