These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Comparing the British and American approaches to regulating ART programmes. Feinman M; Sher G Hum Reprod; 1996 Jul; 11(7):1366-7. PubMed ID: 8671465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 1995 assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic report. Danel IA; Green YT; Walter G J Womens Health; 1998 Apr; 7(3):301-3. PubMed ID: 9580908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The interpretation and use of statistics in assisted reproductive technologies. Powers RD; Martin PM Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2000 Sep; 27(3):529-40. PubMed ID: 10958001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ART into science: regulation of fertility techniques. ISLAT (Institute for Science Law, and Technology) Working Group. Science; 1998 Jul; 281(5377):651-2. PubMed ID: 9714673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assisted reproductive techniques and the law. Deech R Med Leg J; 2001; 69(Pt 1):13-24. PubMed ID: 11388066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Birth rights. Philpot T Nurs Stand; 2002 Aug 14-20; 16(48):16-7. PubMed ID: 12226878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Surveillance of assisted reproductive technology in the United States. An update. Meikle SF; Danel I; Wilcox LS Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 10407592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Off the grid. Nat Biotechnol; 2016 Sep; 34(9):891. PubMed ID: 27606441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]