These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8672788)

  • 41. Occupational exposure to electric and magnetic fields during work tasks at 110 kV substations in the Tampere region.
    Korpinen LH; Pääkkönen RJ
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2010 Apr; 31(3):252-4. PubMed ID: 20077529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: basic aspects and review of exposure assessment approaches.
    Hartwig V; Romeo S; Zeni O
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Apr; 56(4):531-545. PubMed ID: 29344902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Numerical study of currents in workers induced by body-motion around high-ultrahigh field MRI magnets.
    ; Trakic A; Wang H; Liu F
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1261-77. PubMed ID: 17969138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Acute neurobehavioral effects of exposure to static magnetic fields: analyses of exposure-response relations.
    de Vocht F; Stevens T; van Wendel-de-Joode B; Engels H; Kromhout H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Mar; 23(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 16463303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessment of exposure to MRI motion-induced fields based on the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) guidelines.
    Zilberti L; Bottauscio O; Chiampi M
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Oct; 76(4):1291-300. PubMed ID: 26525160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of exposure to high flux density static and pulsed magnetic fields on lymphocyte function.
    Aldinucci C; Garcia JB; Palmi M; Sgaragli G; Benocci A; Meini A; Pessina F; Rossi C; Bonechi C; Pessina GP
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2003 Sep; 24(6):373-9. PubMed ID: 12929155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Exposure assessment of electromagnetic fields near electrosurgical units.
    Wilén J
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2010 Oct; 31(7):513-8. PubMed ID: 20607736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Patient exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance scanners: a review].
    Guibelalde del Castillo E
    Radiologia; 2013 Dec; 55 Suppl 2():2-8. PubMed ID: 24246885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Occupational exposure to power frequency fields in some electrical transformation stations in Romania.
    Goiceanu C; Danulescu R
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2006; 12(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 16790172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessment of physiotherapists' occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from shortwave and microwave diathermy devices: a literature review.
    Shah SG; Farrow A
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(6):312-27. PubMed ID: 23570423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. TOWARDS A PERSONALISED AND INTERACTIVE ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO MAGNETIC FIELD DURING DAILY ROUTINE IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE.
    Hartwig V; Virgili G; Ferrante Vero LF; De Marchi D; Landini L; Giovannetti G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):546-554. PubMed ID: 30053260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Assessment of daily exposure of endodontic personnel to extremely low frequency magnetic fields.
    Kim DW; Choi JL; Kwon MK; Nam TJ; Lee SJ
    Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):744-8. PubMed ID: 22429106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. MRI 'EXPOSIMETRY': HOW TO ANALYZE, COMPARE AND REPRESENT WORKER EXPOSURE TO STATIC MAGNETIC FIELD?
    Delmas A; Weber N; Piffre J; Pasquier C; Felblinger J; Vuissoz PA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Dec; 177(4):415-423. PubMed ID: 28499015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Analysis and measurements of magnetic field exposures for healthcare workers in selected MR environments.
    Fuentes MA; Trakic A; Wilson SJ; Crozier S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Apr; 55(4):1355-64. PubMed ID: 18390326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Health effects of occupational exposure to static magnetic fields used in magnetic resonance imaging: a review].
    Franco G; Perduri R; Murolo A
    Med Lav; 2008; 99(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 18254536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Rotatable Small Permanent Magnet Array for Ultra-Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Instrumentation: A Concept Study.
    Vogel MW; Giorni A; Vegh V; Pellicer-Guridi R; Reutens DC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157040. PubMed ID: 27271886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Measures of occupational exposure to time-varying low frequency magnetic fields of non-uniform spatial distribution in the light of international guidelines and electrodynamic exposure effects in the human body].
    Karpowicz J; Zradziński P; Gryz K
    Med Pr; 2012; 63(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 22880453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields as risk factors in chemical industry.
    Troptcheva T; Ivanova M; Israel M
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 1998 Sep; 71 Suppl():S92-6. PubMed ID: 9827891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A personal dosimeter prototype for static magnetic fields.
    Cavagnetto F; Prati P; Ariola V; Corvisiero P; Marinelli M; Pilot A; Taccini G
    Health Phys; 1993 Aug; 65(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 8330964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Absence of relation between sick leave caused by musculoskeletal disorders and exposure to magnetic fields in an aluminum plant.
    Moen BE; Drabløs PA; Pedersen S; Sjøen M; Thommesen G
    Bioelectromagnetics; 1996; 17(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 8742754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.